ShareThis Page
Political Headlines

Mika Brzezinski described Pompeo with a homophobic word. Her non-apology didn't help.

| Wednesday, Dec. 12, 2018, 9:42 p.m.
Mika Brzezinski, seen April 22, 2013, withMSNBC’s “Morning Joe” co-hosts Joe Scarborough, called Secretary of State Mike Pompeo a “wannabe dictator’s butt-boy” during a segment of the show Wednesday, Dec. 12, 2018.
Mika Brzezinski, seen April 22, 2013, withMSNBC’s “Morning Joe” co-hosts Joe Scarborough, called Secretary of State Mike Pompeo a “wannabe dictator’s butt-boy” during a segment of the show Wednesday, Dec. 12, 2018.

MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski called Secretary of State Mike Pompeo a “wannabe dictator’s butt-boy” during a segment of “Morning Joe” Wednesday.

The remark related to a less-than-impassioned response from Pompeo about the murder of Saudi journalist and Washington Post contributor Jamal Khashoggi. Pompeo ducked questions in a “Fox & Friends” interview about Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s role in the killing.

“I understand that Donald Trump doesn’t care,” Brzezinski said to host Joe Scarborough. Moments earlier, Scarborough spoke to a panel that included Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., who labeled Trump’s motivation to ignore the inculpatory evidence against the crown prince financially based.

“But why doesn’t Mike Pompeo care right now? Are the pathetic deflections that we just heard when he appeared on Fox & Friends - is that a patriot speaking?” Brzezinski continued, “Or a wannabe dictator’s butt-boy? I’m dead serious, I’m asking: are these the words of a patriot?”

The network tried to bleep out the insult; representatives declined to comment on whether it was omitted from the closed captioning.

But MSNBC was too slow. And Brzezinski’s Twitter condemnation came quickly.

Some of her more than 850,000 Twitter followers found the language disturbing. Others called the epithet “despicable.”

Journalist Glenn Greenwald tweeted, “Homophobic insults of the kind vomited out this morning by morningmika have become a completely common and acceptable component of anti-Trump discourse, starting from the endless Trump/Putin gay insinuations to trash like this.”

Photographer and writer G.E. Anderson suggested other phrasing: “I was with you, morningmika, right up to the ‘butt boy’ comment. Try ‘toadie’ or ‘lackey’ or ‘stool pigeon’ or ‘ass kisser,’ or ‘traitor,’ but maybe don’t equate homosexuality with Mike Pompeo carrying water for the murderous regime in Saudi Arabia.”

Even Donald Trump Jr. swooped in, not to champion gay rights, but to make a comparison with comedian Kevin Hart, who was recently cut as Oscars host after his homophobic tweets resurfaced.

Brzezinski’s response, through Twitter, did not satisfy the critics.

“Totally agree with you -SUPER BAD choice of words . I should have said “water boy” … like for football teams or something like that. apologize to SenatorDurbin too! SO SORRY!” she tweeted in response to Anderson.

The tweet was attacked from multiple angles.

“Accepting apologies is important. We all fail. But I don’t see that you’ve actually apologized to gays?” said one.

“This is bad. Will require more from Brzezinski than a Twitterpology,” tweeted David Folkenflik, a media correspondent for NPR.

MSNBC declined to comment on any action it may take. The network stood behind host Joy Reid earlier this year after she apologized for controversial years-old blog posts.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me