ShareThis Page
Political Headlines

Wisconsin's Ryan ponders run for White House in 2016

| Sunday, Aug. 24, 2014, 8:21 p.m.

WASHINGTON — Paul Ryan was No. 2 on the Republicans' presidential ballot in 2012, and the Wisconsin congressman is thinking about whether he'll try to move to the top of his party's ticket in 2016.

When asked on Sunday about the possibility of running, Ryan said he and his family will “take very seriously and weigh” the decision next year. Ryan has said he is not eager to spend even more time away from his small Wisconsin hometown where he and his wife, Janna, have raised their family.

Ryan told CBS' “Face the Nation” his new book is designed to unify conservatives about tackling the nation's most critical problems.

Ryan said the 2012 ticket lost for many reasons, but he wishes that former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney would run again.

Meanwhile, Ryan said that he didn't voice his opposition to the government shutdown in 2013 because he wanted to ensure there was “party unity.”

“I don't think it was constructive for conservatives to be carping at each other. At the same time, the purpose of that passage is to try and unify our party. I don't think we can succeed if all we do is criticize and define what we are against,” he said.

Ryan wrote in his book, which came out last week, that he believes the Republican attempt to defund Obamacare by shutting down the government was “a suicide mission” but that too many members of his own party were unwilling to abandon the idea for fear that they would be punished by outside groups aligned with the Tea Party.

He said he didn't believe the strategy was “really legitimate” because a government shutdown cannot stop an entitlement program, not to mention there was no support for the strategy in the Senate.

The point of his book, he said, is “to help design a unified conservative Republican movement that is principled, inclusive and aspirational so that we can win a majority of Americans' votes to save this country from what I believe is going down the wrong track.”

Ryan laughed when asked whether he would support Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas or Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky for the 2016 GOP presidential nomination, before he said he would support either of them if they become the Republican nominee.

“I think there are going to be a lot of other people in this race,” he said. “And what I'm trying to articulate with this book is a kind of conservatism inspired by my mentor Jack Kemp, people like Ronald Reagan, that's inclusive, that's aspirational, that's principled, that also has a strong national defense and a foreign policy that keeps us prosperous and secure.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me