Steelers’ 3 best, worst OLB draft picks in Kevin Colbert era |

Steelers’ 3 best, worst OLB draft picks in Kevin Colbert era

Chris Adamski
AFC defensive end T.J. Watt plays catch during Pro Bowl NFL football practice, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2019, in Kissimmee, Fla.

Editor’s note: This NFL Draft will be the 20th under Steelers general manager Kevin Colbert. His two-decade tenure has produced two Super Bowls and a consistent playoff contender. His drafts mostly reflect that. Like all NFL personnel men, though, he has had some picks he would like to have back. In conjunction with the Trib’s daily positional previews leading up to the April 25 start of the draft, we’ll look back at Colbert’s three best and three worst picks at each position.

During about a decade from the early 1990s to early 2000s, the Steelers built one of the NFL’s best defenses, in part, by being one of its most unique.

They were zigging by running a 3-4 while the majority of other teams were zagging with a 4-3. As such, the Steelers exploited the market on draft day by almost having their choice of college defensive ends who were undersized by NFL defensive-line standards.

It’s how they found mid-round outside linebacker gems such as Greg Lloyd, Jason Gildon and Joey Porter, all of whom became standouts in Pittsburgh. Eventually, the rest of the NFL evolved and started targeting those types of players, too, closing the hole in that market inefficiency.

To punch back, the Steelers needed to draft their outside linebackers earlier. That phenomenon is reflected by where their best and worst edge rushers have been selected over the past two decades.

3 best

1. LaMarr Woodley

2007, second round, 46th overall

It might not be hyperbole to say through five NFL seasons, Woodley had the look of a potential Hall of Famer. Including the playoffs, he had 55 sacks over his first 77 games (60 starts). But his body began to break down at age 27, after which he appeared in just 40 games and had just 10 sacks.

2. Clark Haggans

2000, fifth round, 137th overall

After a virtual redshirt year followed by three years as a backup, Haggans earned a second contract and was a solid starter for some good Steelers teams for four years. He won a Super Bowl ring with them and lasted 13 NFL seasons.

3. T.J. Watt

2017, first round, 30th overall

The book isn’t complete in telling the tale of Watt’s NFL career, but the early chapters have been encouraging. Watt has 20 sacks through two seasons, but to borrow a favorite phrase of coach Mike Tomlin, he’s no one-trick pony, either. Watt is good in the run game and in coverage, too.

3 worst

1. Alonzo Jackson

2003, second round, 59th overall

Confident and productive during a college career at powerhouse Florida State, the Steelers were hoping they had their next great edge rusher when they nabbed Jackson with the pick after they took future Hall of Famer Troy Polamalu. Jackson played in only nine regular-season games for the Steelers, though, and much of his time came on special teams.

2. Bruce Davis

2008, third round, 88th overall

Davis did not record a tackle, appeared in only five regular-season games for the Steelers and was cut before the start of his second season. Along with Jackson, Davis was a cautionary tale on converting college defensive ends to 3-4 outside linebackers.

3. Jarvis Jones

2013, first round, 17th overall

Jones was the rare first-round miss for the Steelers, regardless of position. He might be the best evidence for those who make the argument that combine/pro day measurables trump college production. Jones had six sacks in four NFL seasons after having 28 his final two seasons in the SEC for Georgia.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.