ShareThis Page
3 reasons Pitt might be fun to watch in ACC Tournament |

3 reasons Pitt might be fun to watch in ACC Tournament

Jerry DiPaola
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt head coach Jeff Capel urges on his team against Notre Dame in the second half Saturday, March 10, 2019 at Petersen Events Center.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt’s Jared Wilson-Frame and Xavier Johnson celebrate with Trey McGowens after a steal against Notre Dame late in the second half Saturday, March 10, 2019 at Petersen Events Center.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt’s Jared Wilson-Frame scores past Notre Dame’s Juwan Durham in the second half Saturday. Wilson Frame is shooting 40.9 percent on 3-pointers in his past 14 games.

The ACC is loaded with talented teams, with five of them ranked among the top 15 in the Associated Press poll and three — Virginia, North Carolina and Duke — legit Final Four hopefuls.

Guess what? Pitt won’t meet any of those five if it’s fortunate enough to play two games in the ACC Tournament that opens Tuesday in Charlotte, N.C.

Is that a reason to feel good about Pitt’s chances to reach the ACC quarterfinals?

Maybe not, but here are some facts:

Pitt opens against Boston College (14-16) at 7 p.m. Tuesday and would play Syracuse (19-12) in the second round Wednesday. BC defeated Pitt, 66-57, but has lost nine of its past 12 games, including a 73-47 home loss to N.C. State on Saturday. The Orange beat Pitt twice, but they are entering the tournament as losers of six of their past nine.

Pitt, of course, is on a one-game winning streak after losing 13 in a row, so let’s not get carried away with optimism.

But here are three reasons Pitt could put up a respectable fight in Charlotte:

1. Pitt usually keeps it close

After the Notre Dame game, coach Jeff Capel pointed to only five ACC games (Clemson twice, North Carolina, Duke and Virginia) in which Pitt was thoroughly beaten. In all others, the Panthers needed two or three fruitful possessions at the end to have a chance to change the outcome.

That might have been a lot to ask of a young team, but Pitt did find a way against Notre Dame (thanks, in large part, to the Irish missing three shots in the final 40 seconds).

“It was good to see us win a close game,” Capel said. “We’ve lost a lot of them. It was good to see us be able to finish, especially in the face of some adversity.”

Pitt must get a lift from that experience, or it will be one-and-done for the second year in a row.

2. ‘D’ looks sharp, together

It was only one game against the ACC’s last-place team, but Pitt held Notre Dame to 32.7 percent shooting from the field.

That was most evident in how the Panthers handled John Mooney, the Irish’s best player. Mooney (6-foot-9, 242 pounds) was averaging 14.4 points and shooting 47.9 percent.

Against Pitt, he was 1 for 11 and scored just four points.

Boston College guard Ky Bowman will present a different challenge with a 19.2 scoring average, but he missed 12 of 16 shots against Pitt in February.

3. Johnson getting help

Johnson is Pitt’s all-time leading scorer among freshmen (485 points), but in four of the past five games, two other players claimed high-scoring honors.

Eventually, Johnson could be standing among Pitt’s all-time great guards, but he can’t resurrect the program alone.

Jared Wilson-Frame is shooting 40.9 percent from beyond the 3-point arc in his past 14 games. Trey McGowens led Pitt with 16 points against Notre Dame, and Capel said he saw that confident look return to his freshman’s eyes. Sidy N’Dir hit his first 3-pointer since Feb. 5 after an 0-for-20 slide.

Can those players help Johnson lead Pitt to two victories this week? Wise guys wouldn’t bet on it, but it might be fun to watch them try.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.