ShareThis Page
3 teams have already reached out about Antonio Brown, Steelers’ Kevin Colbert says |

3 teams have already reached out about Antonio Brown, Steelers’ Kevin Colbert says

Chris Adamski

The process of trading Antonio Brown is off and running in earnest.

Pittsburgh Steelers general manager Kevin Colbert said “let’s say three teams have touched base” with the Steelers regarding a trade for Brown, the disgruntled All Pro wide receiver who is seeking a new team. Colbert was speaking in a Friday afternoon interview on NFL Network.

“And we will see where that (interest in trading for Brown) grows,” Colbert said. “And I think it will continue to grow.”

Brown, his father and his agent, Drew Rosenhaus, met with Colbert and Steelers president Art Rooney II on Tuesday in Florida. At a news conference Wednesday, Colbert confirmed the Steelers were going to seek a trade for Brown but only if they got preferably compensation.

Colbert reiterated that Friday on NFL Network. He discussed how teams will have a better idea of what they are willing to offer once their free-agency evaluations are complete and after the combine when draft-eligible players are better known.

“The demand and interest in a potential player like Antonio Brown being available, that will unfurl over these next few weeks as teams get better perspective,” Colbert said.

“If we can come to something that happens to benefit both sides, great,” Colbert said of a trade. “But if it doesn’t benefit us, it won’t happen.”

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.