3 issues Penguins, Jim Rutherford must cope with in retooling | TribLIVE.com

3 issues Penguins, Jim Rutherford must cope with in retooling

Jonathan Bombulie
Phil Kessel’s future with the Penguins remains up in the air.

When he traded defenseman Olli Maatta to the Chicago Blackhawks on Saturday night, Pittsburgh Penguins general manager Jim Rutherford jumped feet-first into the busiest time of the offseason.

The NHL Draft is set for next weekend in Vancouver. On July 1, the league’s free-agent signing period opens.

It’s prime time for Rutherford and the league’s other 30 GMs to retool and reshape their rosters heading into next season.

Here is a look at three pressing issues the Penguins must deal with during that time.

The Phil Kessel situation

If circumstances don’t change, the only thing the Penguins have to do to resolve the Kessel situation is hang a No. 81 jersey in his locker in September and proceed with business as usual.

Let’s face it, though. Circumstances probably are going to change.

The Penguins decided last month the first thing they would do to try to become a team that’s more defensively responsible and less lackadaisical with the puck was to ship Kessel, reportedly to Minnesota for winger Jason Zucker. Kessel exercised his limited no-trade clause to nix the deal.

Could Kessel decide he doesn’t want to play in a place where he’s considered part of the problem, not part of the solution, and therefore relax his stance on where he can be moved? Absolutely.

Could one of the eight teams to which Kessel can be traded without his consent make an offer Rutherford feels comfortable with? No question.

Monitoring changing conditions will be a big part of Rutherford’s job in the next week or two.

Pick it up

While the trades will steal the headlines, the draft remains the fundamental method for building championship teams. For the first time since they took Kasperi Kapanen in 2014, the Penguins will have the chance to make a selection in the first round.

The last four times the Penguins took a player in the range they’re selecting Friday night, they chose Kapanen, Maatta, Joe Morrow and Beau Bennett. None became a superstar, but all became bona fide NHL players.

Because this is considered a deep draft, especially at forward, the Penguins can expect to get a player at the high end of that talent range if they choose wisely.

Goalie on the go

It looks like the rubber finally will meet the road for goaltending prospect Tristan Jarry.

Now 24, Jarry has developed just fine since the Penguins drafted him in the second round in 2013, but he was beaten by Casey DeSmith in the race to back up Matt Murray and the sands in his waivers hourglass have run out.

Trading Jarry, if they can find a taker, would be preferable to losing him on waivers in September.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review assistant sports editor. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.