ACC’s new opening-night schedule draws mixed reviews |

ACC’s new opening-night schedule draws mixed reviews

Jerry DiPaola
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt coach Jeff Capel smiles as time runs out on Florida State in the second half Wednesday, Nov. 6, 2019 at Petersen Events Center.

Jeff Capel was a winner. Jim Boeheim a loser.

That important distinction dictated how the Pitt and Syracuse coaches perceived their season openers Wednesday night.

Capel’s Pitt team was not at its best, missing more than two-thirds of its shots in a 63-61 victory against Florida State.

Capel was pleased but also relieved to escape with the victory. It was a departure from the usual cupcakes Pitt — and most teams — play in their openers. But he didn’t seem to mind.

ACC Videos

“I’m just glad we were able to win,” he said.

Meanwhile, Boeheim’s Syracuse team missed more than three-fourths of its shots and lost, 48-34, to defending national champion Virginia. Syracuse’s point total was the fewest under Boeheim, whose first season with the Orange was 1976. It was also the fewest by a Syracuse team since a 49-31 loss to Temple in 1945.

The games were a departure from traditional openers in college basketball in which teams schedule less formidable opponents to help players ease into the season.

Every ACC team, except No. 3 Duke, opened against a conference opponent. Duke defeated No. 4 Kansas at Madison Square Garden on Tuesday.

Boeheim doesn’t like the ACC’s new way of starting the season, calling it “a money grab.”

He wasn’t reluctant to share his feelings but with one caveat.

“I wish we would have won so when I say what I’m going to say, it would matter,” he said after the game.

“You never want to play the league games early. That’s stupid. It’s just a money grab. They’ve got scheduled games for TV, for the TV contracts, so you’ve got to play games early and then somebody had the brilliant idea of opening up the first game with a league game.

“I just don’t think it’s good. I don’t think it’s smart. You want to build up to league. The league’s the most important thing, so why would you play the first game of the year in the league? Makes no sense to me but that’s just what happens when you go up to 20 games and someone wants you to play early.”

Pitt and Syracuse will play another conference game next month, another departure from past procedures. Pitt visits Louisville on Dec. 6, and Syracuse is at Georgia Tech on Dec. 7. In most seasons, teams do not play conference games until the nonconference portion of the schedule ends.

Pitt’s next game is Saturday against Nicholls State of the Southland Conference, and it might not be any easier than its tight victory against Florida State.

Nicholls, which trailed by 20 points early in the second half, took Illinois into overtime on Tuesday before losing, 78-70.

“I thought we were outplayed tonight,” Illinois coach Brad Underwood said.

Pitt must keep an eye on Nicholls’ Dexter McClanahan, who scored 25 points in the game.

Pitt will play three more nonconference Power 5 opponents — West Virginia, Kansas State and Rutgers — before the Louisville game.

Get the latest news about Pitt basketball and all things Panthers athletics.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.