After two days of sightseeing, Pitt defeats The Netherlands, 60-55, in Rome |

After two days of sightseeing, Pitt defeats The Netherlands, 60-55, in Rome

Jerry DiPaola

For a team that spent the previous two days sightseeing, the Pitt squad responded better than anyone could have expected Thursday to win its first game in Italy, 60-55, against The Netherlands “B” team.

The game was played at Fonte RomaEur in Rome after the team had visited the Colosseum, Vatican City and Trevi Fountain among other historic sites.

Xavier Johnson and newcomer Ryan Murphy combined to score 33 points. Johnson scored a game-high 20 and added four rebounds and three assists. Murphy, a junior-college transfer, was four of eight from beyond the 3-point arc and finished with 13 points and a team-high six rebounds.

“First and foremost, defensively we did a pretty good job,” Pitt assistant coach Tim O’Toole said. “On the road, obviously, to a national team with pros. So, we’re happy with that.”

ACC Videos

In a game played with a four-quarter format, Murphy triggered a rally in the final period by hitting two 3-point field goals to give Pitt a 48-44 lead. The Panthers led throughout the final 10 minutes.

The Netherlands surged to a 12-6 lead before a 3-point field goal by freshman Justin Champagnie gave Pitt a 14-12 lead after the first quarter.

Late turnovers before halftime helped The Netherlands take a 24-22 lead into the break. Boy van Vlient picked off an errant pass and scored to give the Netherlands the lead. Pitt shot 8 of 34 (23.5 percent) and committed 11 turnovers in the first 20 minutes but kept pace with a 17-11 rebounding advantage.

“There are plenty of good things that happened,” O’Toole said, “but things we need to tighten up.”

Pitt will depart Rome on Friday morning and travel to Florence to prepare for a Saturday game against the Florence All-Stars.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.