After winning small events, Justin Harding makes most of big stage at Masters |
U.S./World Sports

After winning small events, Justin Harding makes most of big stage at Masters

Associated Press
Justin Harding hits from a bunker on the 18th hole during the first round of the Masters on Thursday, April 11, 2019, in Augusta, Ga.

AUGUSTA, Ga. — Justin Harding of South Africa spent most of his Masters debut Thursday atop the leaderboard, and that’s not an unusual position for him over the past year.

No one else at Augusta National can claim five victories and three runner-up finishes since the last Masters. Then again, few Masters competitors were in the Lombard Insurance Open or the Royal Swazi Open.

The biggest win of his career so far was the Masters — in Qatar, not Georgia. Harding moved into the top 50 of the world ranking to secure his first Masters invitation with a runner-up finish in the Kenya Open.

“I handled the emotions of the day quite well,” Harding said after opening with a 3-under-par 69.

And for one day, it was a reminder winning anywhere in the world means a player is doing something right.

He stood out as an example of why the PGA Tour believes some other tours might be getting too many world ranking points based on weaker fields. This has nothing to do with Harding. All he has done is play tournaments, and the 33-year-old who competed collegiately at Lamar outside Houston is playing the best golf of his life.

He ended 2017 at No. 712 in the world. He goes into the Masters at No. 49.

In the last year, he has won twice on the Sunshine Tour (one was a 54-hole event), twice on the Asian Tour and once on the European Tour (Qatar Masters).

He made his American debut two weeks ago in the Dell Match Play, and while he didn’t advance out of his group, he managed to beat Matt Fitzpatrick and Luke List, but Harding lost to Rory McIlroy.

Most of these courses are new to Harding, just like Augusta National.

So when Harding was reminded of his rookie status at the Masters, and how it has been 40 years since a newcomer won a green jacket, he wasn’t bothered.

“It’s pretty much how I’ve been playing for the last 15 months,” Harding said. “I’m seeing the golf course for the first time almost every week. So I’m not taking any real demons, any bad shots or any bad memories into them, I suppose.”

He knows Augusta National a little better from watching the Masters over the years. He has an idea how to attack or avoid certain pins.

“We executed our plan and played away from flags when we needed to, counted on a good putter, and that certainly worked for the most part today,” he said.

Only one of his five birdies came on a par 5, at No. 15, and it required a wedge off a severe slope to about 7 feet, which he rapped in with his long putter. He dropped a shot on the beefy par-4 fifth and at the last when he failed to get up-and-down from a bunker.

“At the end of the day, you’re going to make some mistakes out here,” he said. “Nobody really goes bogey-free. It’s just a matter of making more birdies than bogeys and seeing what happens over the weekend.”

Gary Player (three times), Charl Schwartzel and Trevor Immelman are the other South Africans to win a green jacket. Harding sought advice from Ernie Els, who had to settle for the silver medal twice at Augusta. He also played practice rounds — nine holes a day because of the rain — with Schwartzel, Branden Grace, Louis Oosthuizen and British Amateur champ Jovan Rebula.

“Just trying to pick the big boys’ brains, and it’s just helpful,” he said. “We played the golf course in our brains a few times having watched it on TV. You know where to hit it. It’s just a matter of handling the nerves and executing the golf shots.”

Categories: Sports | US-World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.