Airing of grievances uplifting for Duquesne women |

Airing of grievances uplifting for Duquesne women

Jerry DiPaola
Duquesne senior Chassidy Omogrosso (Blackhawk) is a two-year captain for the Dukes, who, for the first time, were picked as the preseason favorite in the Atlantic 10.

Dan Burt knew it was time to act. His players concurred.

The Duquesne women’s basketball team, which was named the preseason favorite to win the Atlantic 10 with a veteran, tournament-tested group, reached January with an unremarkable 6-7 nonconference record.

“November and December were tough on us,” said Burt, who has been Duquesne’s coach since 2013. “I was a little overzealous with the scheduling (playing five teams from power conferences and losing to four of them). That affected our confidence.

“We didn’t listen really well to each other, and that includes me listening to the kids and vice versa. We had to find our path.”

It was time for a team meeting.

Burt doesn’t remember the date of the meeting or his team’s record at the time, and he said no one in particular suggested it. But it worked.

Duquesne finished the A-10 regular season with an 11-5 record (17-12 overall) and will carry a five-game winning streak and No. 3 seed into the conference tournament, beginning Tuesday against No. 14 seeded Rhode Island (8-20) at Palumbo Center.

The A-10 first-round games are held on-campus before the surviving eight teams move on to Palumbo Center for the remainder of the tournament beginning with Friday’s quarterfinals.

“We had a really strong team meeting where everyone was able to air their issues and their grievances and their comments,” Burt said. “We all agreed that we needed to sit down and talk things out and figure out what were the issues and what were maybe the little things that some of us didn’t know about someone else that we needed to fix.

“I think every team, whether you’re the Pirates or the Steelers or the Penguins or you’re a high school team, you have moments where you have to have these kind of meetings.

“In my 22-plus years of Division I basketball, that’s the best one I’ve been a part of because of the respectful nature that everyone had for one another and how we came, not only with grievances and complaints, but with solutions.”

Something else helped, too. The women started making shots.

“That cures a lot of things,” Burt said.

Duquesne has an interesting mix of veterans and youth. Sophomores Amanda Kalin (Pine-Richland), Halle Bovell and Libby Bazelak are starters. Meanwhile, five players who will graduate this year — Chassidy Omogrosso (Blackhawk), Kadri-Ann Lass, Julijana Vojinovic, Conor Richardson (Carlynton) and Eniko Kuttor — have combined to score nearly 5,000 career points. Scoring this season is evenly distributed among Omogrosso, Lass and Vojinovic, who average 11.9, 11.4 and 11.2 points.

At 6-foot-3, Lass is projected by ESPN Draft Express to be a third-round WNBA Draft choice. She leads the A-10 in blocked shots (2.1 per game).

The seniors have been a part of 87 victories while playing — and losing — in two of the past three conference championship games. Three years ago, Duquesne reached the NCAA Tournament, beat Seton Hall, lost to eventual national champion UConn and finished 28-6.

“If we do what we think we’re capable of doing over the next three weeks, they’ll leave here as the all-time best class in terms of winning,” Burt said.

With talent, depth and the home court, Burt said, “We’re in the right place at the right time. We’re ready to go.”

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Duquesne
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.