Andrew Luck couldn’t keep up with Ben in only career start against Steelers |

Andrew Luck couldn’t keep up with Ben in only career start against Steelers

Joe Rutter
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Colts quarterback Andrew Luck argues with umpire Mark Pellis, as the Steelers’ Brett Keisel celebrates a safety during the fourth quarter Sunday, Oct. 26, 2014, at Heinz Field.

Andrew Luck’s sudden retirement from the Indianapolis Colts on Saturday night will deny fans the chance to watch him play against the Steelers this season. The Colts are scheduled to visit Heinz Field on Nov. 3.

The game would have been just the second start for Luck against the Steelers, an indication of the lengthy injury history that contributed to his walking away from the game at age 29.

The past three times the teams met, the Colts started Matt Hasselbeck (2015), Scott Tolzien (2016) and Jacoby Brissett (2017) at quarterback. Charlie Whitehurst also saw action in the 2015 meeting.

Luck’s only start against the Steelers was a memorable one. In an October 2014 matchup at Heinz Field, Luck got into a high-scoring duel with Ben Roethlisberger.

Luck completed 26 of 45 passes for 400 yards and three touchdowns with two interceptions. Roethlisberger, however, threw for a career-high 522 yards in the Steelers’ 51-34 victory. Roethlisberger threw six touchdowns and wasn’t intercepted while completing 40 of 49 attempts.

Luck’s last touchdown pass in that game, coincidentally, was thrown to current Steelers wide receiver Donte Moncrief, a 31-yard score in the third quarter that cut the Steelers’ lead to 42-34.

Luck was hurt earlier in the game by an interception that William Gay returned 33 yards for a touchdown to provide the Steelers with a 21-3 lead.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.