ShareThis Page
Steelers’ Antonio Brown involved in domestic dispute, not arrested |

Steelers’ Antonio Brown involved in domestic dispute, not arrested

Joe Rutter
Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver Antonio Brown (84) makes his way to the end zone after catching a pass for a touchdown against the Cleveland Browns in the second quarter of an NFL football game, Sunday, Oct. 28, 2018, in Pittsburgh. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)

Antonio Brown is back in the news again for all of the wrong reasons.

The star Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver, already the subject of trade rumors because of his behavior at the end of the season, was investigated for domestic misconduct against a woman in a January domestic dispute, according to the Hollywood (Fla.) Police Dept.

A spokesman for the Hollywood Police said in an email to the Tribune-Review that “officers did respond to a domestic dispute involving Mr. Brown last month. No arrests were made.”

TMZ Sports first reported the incident involving the 30-year-old Brown on Tuesday afternoon.

Brown’s attorney, Darren Heitner, released the following statement when contacted by multiple outlets, including the Tribune-Review: “The allegations are baseless and false. It’s unfortunate that the media is trying to use distractions like this and prior stories in an effort to tarnish my client’s name and reputation. We have no further comment.”

Brown maintains a residence in south Florida and has spent much of his time there since the Steelers’ season ended.

The Steelers released a statement through spokesman Burt Lauten:

“We were made aware earlier today of the alleged incident involving Antonio Brown last month in Florida. We are still in the process of gathering information, consequently we have no further comment at this time.”

Brown was inactive for the final game of the season after he skipped a team meeting and a walkthrough after an incident that happened in practice earlier in the week. Brown did not report to clean out his locker or a final meeting with coach Mike Tomlin, and he ignored texts from his coach in addition to team president Art Rooney II.

Because of that incident, the Steelers are expected to try to trade Brown once the new NFL calendar year begins March 13.

Brown also was involved in several other off-field incidents in the past year, including being cited for driving in excess of 100 mph on McKnight Road. He also faced a lawsuit that accused him of throwing furniture off a high-rise apartment balcony in Florida, with the furniture nearly striking a toddler.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at [email protected] or via Twitter @tribjoerutter.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.