Steelers’ Antonio Brown smokes cigars with Chad Johnson |

Steelers’ Antonio Brown smokes cigars with Chad Johnson

Chris Adamski

Antonio Brown

It all started 8 ½ years ago with #JagrWatch. Last year, it was “Where’s Le’Veon?” So far in 2019, the Pittsburgh sports scene is enamored with following Antonio Brown.

Friday, Brown showed up on the social-media accounts of former Cincinnati Bengals star receiver Chad Johnson (nee Ochocinco), smoking cigars.

During a video posted on Instagram earlier, Brown reportedly said, “I’ll be coming out later today to address all the speculation. That’s all I can say right now,” according to transcription from the Twitter account NFL Update (@MySportsUpdate).

Brown was with former teammate James Harrison the last time he showed up on an Instagram video and teased he would speak publicly about his deteriorating situation with the Pittsburgh Steelers.

Coach Mike Tomlin did not play him in the Dec. 30 season finale after Brown skipped the previous day’s walkthrough and did not practice all week while complaining of a knee injury. Brown, per Tomlin, did not get an MRI on the knee he was asked to get, and he did not return repeated phone messages from Tomlin over the days before and the days after the game against the Bengals.

Brown skipped a team meeting the day after the season ended and reportedly has not yet spoken to team personnel, as rumors swirl the Steelers are exploring trading the eight-time Pro Bowl receiver.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Chad Johnson, left, and Antonio Brown
Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.