3 Pitt opponents ranked in AP preseason Top 25 poll | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

3 Pitt opponents ranked in AP preseason Top 25 poll

Jerry DiPaola
1561105_web1_gtr-pitt02-080619
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt head coach Pat Narduzzi during practice Aug. 5, 2019 at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.

Using the Associated Press’ 2019 preseason poll and the final poll from 2018 as guides, Pitt’s football schedule appears slightly less daunting than it did a year ago. But it is not an easy schedule, either.

The Associated Press released its preseason poll Monday, six days before college football gets underway Saturday when Miami plays No. 8 Florida in Orlando, Fla.

Three Pitt opponents are ranked in the Top 25 – No. 15 Penn State, No. 17 Central Florida and No. 22 Syracuse. Among others receiving votes are three members of Pitt’s ACC Coastal Division — No. 29 Miami, No. 32 Virginia and No. 36 Virginia Tech.

In last season’s final poll, four Pitt opponents were ranked. Notre Dame was No. 5, followed by No. 11 UCF, No. 15 Syracuse and No. 17 Penn State. Pitt was 1-3 against those opponents.


Pitt will run into only two members of the ESPN preseason All-American team — Virginia cornerback Bryce Hall in the opener Aug. 31 at Heinz Field and Syracuse kicker Andre Szmyt on Oct. 18 at the Carrier Dome. Hall recorded 22 pass breakups last season and Symyt hit 30 of 34 field goal attempts.

Defending national champion Clemson is ranked No. 1 by the AP in the preseason, followed by Alabama, Georgia, Oklahoma and Ohio State.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.