Are Pirates’ pennant hopes gone? Here’s why they are, and why there’s hope | TribLIVE.com
Pirates/MLB

Are Pirates’ pennant hopes gone? Here’s why they are, and why there’s hope

Jerry DiPaola
1408823_web1_1162018559
Nuccio DiNuzzo | Getty Images
Manager Clint Hurdle of the Pittsburgh Pirates visits the mound during a pitching change, during the sixth inning against the Chicago Cubs at Wrigley Field on July 14, 2019 in Chicago, Illinois.
1408823_web1_1162026557
Nuccio DiNuzzo | Getty Images
Trevor Williams (34) of the Pittsburgh Pirates before being pulled during the sixth inning against the Chicago Cubs at Wrigley Field on July 14, 2019 in Chicago, Illinois.

There is an argument to be made that the Pittsburgh Pirates’ playoff hopes disappeared during the three-game sweep by the Chicago Cubs at Wrigley Field.

The Pirates never have been more than five games over .500 this season, and that was April 20. Even after winning eight of 12 leading into the All-Star break, they still were a game under .500.

Now, after squandering an opportunity to stay within a short reach of the first-place Cubs, they are back to merely trying to regain relevance.

Can the Pirates (44-48) become part of the playoff chase over the next two months?

Here are two reasons why that might not happen:

1. Miserable starting pitching

You can take this all the way back to Chad Kuhl’s Tommy John surgery 10 months ago that will keep him off the mound until spring training 2020. Kuhl started 61 games over the previous three seasons.

Then, Jameson Taillon’s elbow issues have made him nothing more than an anxious spectator since May 1. Taillon was supposed to be the ace of this staff.

Jordan Lyles, Trevor Williams, Chris Archer and Steven Brault have spent time on the injured list (Brault is still there), and Archer’s struggles when healthy have been well-documented.

Most distressing has been the downward spiral of Williams and Lyles.

Williams was a 14-game winner with a 3.11 ERA last season. In his past four starts since coming off the injured list, he has allowed 24 runs and 37 hits in 22 2/3 innings. The Pirates actually won two of those games, but such good fortune never lasts long.

Lyles had a 1.97 ERA on May 17. It’s now 5.16, and opponents have scored 33 times with 42 hits in his past 29 1/3 innings.

Is there help on the way?

Taillon’s season might be over, especially if the Pirates continue to fall out of the race. What would be the point of risking a valuable future commodity?

Brault could return before the end of the month, and, perhaps, Williams and Lyles will find their past success.

A trade might help, but Neal Huntington will become a buyer at the trade deadline only if the Pirates look like contenders.

Archer’s strong outing in Chicago and rookie Dario Agrazal’s 2-0 record and 2.81 ERA over his first three starts offer hope.

But pennant contenders need four or five good starters. At the moment, the Pirates are woefully short in that department.

2. Too much competition

Before Monday’s game in St. Louis, the Pirates were only 3 ½ games short of the second wild-card team (the Phillies). But they must hurdle five other teams to get there.

The Cardinals are one of them, which make the next nine games against St. Louis and Philadelphia critical. If the Pirates can’t win six, the season might be all but over.

Catching the Cubs in the National League Central won’t be easy, either. The Pirates were in fourth place, 5 ½ games behind, and the Brewers are due to start winning.

There are just too many teams with too much talent standing between the Pirates and the playoffs.

But here are two reasons to be optimistic:

1. The emergence of Starling Marte

Can we stop with the calls to trade Marte?

With a base salary that goes from $10 million this season to only $11.5 million in 2020, Marte is a bargain.

Yes, he could bring a good return, but who would chase down those line drives in the left-center and right-center gaps? Who would provide the home run stroke to complement Josh Bell with Gregory Polanco nursing a shoulder injury?

Marte is only the second Pirates player in history with 100 homers and 200 stolen bases (100/227), joining Barry Bonds. The team would miss his athletic gifts in many ways.

If Bell slumps — and he was hitless in six of nine games with a five-game streak without an RBI before Monday — Marte can be a safety net. He has 15 home runs, 51 RBIs and a slugging percentage of .484 that trails only Bell and Bryan Reynolds on the team.

If Marte’s bat stays hot, perhaps the Pirates can start winning games 10-9.

2. The closer

Felipe Vazquez should be well-rested for the rest of the season after throwing only 4 1/3 innings in July.

For all of their troubles, the Pirates play a lot of close games — 13 of past 23 have been decided by one or two runs.

They are only 7-6 in those games, but what if the starters and middle relievers pick up their game a bit?

Vazquez could be the Pirates’ second-most valuable player behind Bell.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.