Steelers’ Art Rooney II declines to discuss departures of Antonio Brown, Le’Veon Bell | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Steelers’ Art Rooney II declines to discuss departures of Antonio Brown, Le’Veon Bell

Joe Rutter
920492_web1_AP_18324189027190
Steelers majority owner and president Art Rooney II stands on the sideline during warmups against the Jaguars on Sunday, Nov. 18, 2018, in Jacksonville, Fla.

Art Rooney II is looking forward and not back as he prepares for the NFL annual meeting in Phoenix.

On a conference call Friday with reporters, the Pittsburgh Steelers president opted not to discuss the departures of Pro Bowl players Antonio Brown and Le’Veon Bell.

Both players took verbal jabs at the organization in general and quarterback Ben Roethlisberger in particular. Rooney, though, would not discuss either player specifically when asked about their departures.

“We are excited about the players we are going to have and are going to have in the building,” Rooney said, via The Athletic, “and are looking forward to getting started on the 2019 season.”

Brown was traded to the Oakland Raiders for third-round and fifth-round selections in the April draft. Bell, after sitting out a season, signed with the New York Jets.


Related: Steelers owner Art Rooney II opposes expanding replay

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.