Artie Burns gets 1st-team reps on day his Steelers $800,000 roster bonus was due |

Artie Burns gets 1st-team reps on day his Steelers $800,000 roster bonus was due

Chris Adamski
Artie Burns | Tribune-Review
Steelers cornerback Artie Burns takes down receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster during practice Sunday, July 28, 2019 at St. Vincent College.

It apparently was so far off the radar Mike Tomlin would not even entertain the thought.

“I didn’t know that he was in adversity,” the Pittsburgh Steelers coach said Sunday of his former first-round draft pick cornerback Artie Burns.

Over a span of about 14 months between ending in late 2018, Burns went from the Steelers’ No. 1 cornerback to not being able to get off the bench on defense and fighting for a roster spot.

But perhaps Sunday exemplified how far Burns has come back, ever-so-gradually, into the Steelers’ plans.

On the day he was due an $800,000 bonus if he remained on the Steelers’ roster, Burns often was repping with the first-team defense at left cornerback.

That designation was only occurringbecause Haden was given a light day in respect to his veteran status, but it = does not diminish the significance that the Steelers view Burns as their No. 3 outside cornerback at it stands.

“He’s playing solidly,” Tomlin said, “but we are just getting (started) here.”

Burns has a long way to go to secure a significant role on the Steelers’ 2019 defense, let alone to make the team. It also seems unlikely a scenario exists in which he is with the team beyond this season.

But passing the roster-bonus deadline is a clear sign the Steelers haven’t given up on Burns.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.