As clincher grows closer, Stanley Cup ratings rise in Pittsburgh market |

As clincher grows closer, Stanley Cup ratings rise in Pittsburgh market

Jonathan Bombulie
Boston Bruins fans watch the closing minutes of Game 5 of the NHL hockey Stanley Cup Final between the Bruins and the St. Louis Blues, Thursday, June 6, 2019, in Boston.

As the Stanley Cup gets closer to being awarded, local hockey fans are paying more attention to the final series between the St. Louis Blues and Boston Bruins.

The Pittsburgh market ranked fifth in the country with a 6.0 rating for Thursday night’s 2-1 Blues victory on NBC, behind Boston, St. Louis, Providence and Buffalo.

Pittsburgh also ranked fifth for Game 2 earlier in the series, but with a 4.0 rating. For Game 4, the Kansas City market moved ahead of Pittsburgh into the fifth spot.

Last year, with Marc-Andre Fleury’s Vegas Golden Knights facing the Washington Capitals, Game 5 drew a 10.7 rating in the Pittsburgh market.

The national overnight rating of 3.97 on Thursday was the fourth-best recorded by NBC Sports for a non-clinching game. The best was a 4.41 for Game 5 between the Penguins and Detroit Red Wings in 2008, a game won by the Penguins on a Petr Sykora goal in the third overtime.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review assistant sports editor. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.