Believe it: Steelers are in midst of one of best decades in NFL history | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Believe it: Steelers are in midst of one of best decades in NFL history

Chris Adamski
1265465_web1_GTR-Steelers210-121718
Steelers receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster hugs Patriots head coach Bill Belichick after their game Sunday, Dec. 16, 2018, at Heinz Field.

It seems as if many Pittsburgh Steelers fans feel somewhere on a spectrum of unfulfilled to disappointed to frustrated with how their team has played over the past nine seasons.

Turns out, the Steelers have been borderline-historically good.

Data compiled by German reporter René Bugner evaluates every NFL team’s record by calendar decade since the AFL/NFL merger (i.e., 1970’s, 1980’s, 1990’s, 2000’s, 2010’s). And although the current 10-year span ranks just third-best for the Steelers among the five decades for the franchise, it’s among the top 15 decades the combined league has seen.

The Steelers since 2010 have gone 99-55-1, a winning percentage of .642 that is bested only by the New England Patriots (an all-time best .771).

The Steel Curtain Steelers of the 1970’s rank sixth all-time with a .701 win percentage; the two-time Super Bowl champion Steelers of 2000-09 have the 15th-bets decade over the past 50 years at 113-60-1.

As Pro Football Talk points out, defending Super Bowl champion New England could go 3-13 this season and still finish with the best decade in NFL history.

The Steelers put together two of the best consecutive decades of any NFL franchise since the merger… yet they are a distant, distant second over the past 20 years to the Patriots.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.