Bengals encouraged by 1st game under new coach Zac Taylor |

Bengals encouraged by 1st game under new coach Zac Taylor

Associated Press
Bengals coach Zac Taylor (right) talks with quarterback Andy Dalton during the second half against the Seahawks on Sunday, Sept. 8, 2019, in Seattle.

CINCINNATI — Andy Dalton had a career day. The defense played far better than at any time last season. An opener that could have turned ugly became a point of optimism.

The Bengals couldn’t pull off the upset in Seattle, but the way they played suggested this could be a much different team under first-year coach Zac Taylor.

A 21-20 loss to the Seahawks left Cincinnati disappointed but not discouraged. In fact, the Bengals came away feeling pretty good, all things considered.

“The first full game as a team, really, with these systems in place, these players in the building — there’s some unknowns that come with that,” Taylor said Monday. “We expected to win that game and feel we should have won that game, but I think our guys now know we’re as good as we think we can be.

“We can’t make the same mistakes we just did, but we’re a football team that’s poised to do some really good things if we continue to make the improvements we need to make.”

What’s working

One of the biggest questions in Seattle was how Dalton would look his first time running Taylor’s full offense. The Bengals threw a lot of screen passes to negate the Seahawks’ pass rush, and Dalton took advantage of a defense that sometimes conceded short throws — a “rope-a-dope” approach, as Seahawks coach Pete Carroll put it.

Dalton had a career-high 35 completions in 51 attempts, three shy of his career high. He finished with a career-best 418 yards with two touchdowns, no interceptions and five sacks. He also fumbled twice.

In his first time in the new offense, Dalton was a good fit.

“We were encouraged by everything we did,” Dalton said.


What needs help

The run game. Cincinnati was able to throw for so many yards in part because Seattle stacked the line of scrimmage to stop Joe Mixon and Giovani Bernard, and it worked. They combined for only 13 carries and 31 yards. Mixon left with a sprained ankle. It’s unclear whether he’ll be available next Sunday against San Francisco.


Stock up

Sam Hubbard had a career-high 10 tackles and two sacks, matching his career high. The second-year end anchored a line that limited Seattle to 233 yards and 72 yards rushing. The Seahawks managed only 12 first downs and had the ball for 11 minutes less than the Bengals. It all started with the line.

“Those guys really gave us a great chance to make plays on the back end,” cornerback Dre Kirkpatrick said. “If they keep that up, there’s going to be a lot of chances for turnovers.”


Stock down

Randy Bullock made a pair of field goals but was wide left on a 45-yard attempt in the third quarter that could have made it 20-14. It was one of several missed opportunities that could have swung the game.

Dalton fumbled on Cincinnati’s opening possession of the second half, the wet ball slipping out of his hand as he got ready to throw a screen pass on a play from the Seattle 12-yard line. Those two missed chances prevented Cincinnati from taking control.



Mixon got his left ankle twisted on a run early in the third quarter and didn’t return. Taylor said Monday the injury is only a sprain and Mixon is day-to-day, which was encouraging news. Mixon led the AFC in rushing last season with 1,168 yards.


Key number

The Bengals averaged 50,753 fans for their home games last season, the second-lowest mark in the NFL. It’ll be interesting to see whether the solid overall showing in Seattle helps sell more tickets for their home opener Sunday against the 49ers.


Next steps

Win a game. The Bengals had several chances to pull off the big upset on the road, but missed their chances to take control in the second half and let it slip away.

Categories: Sports | NFL
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.