Benny Snell impresses Steelers in 1st extensive action | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Benny Snell impresses Steelers in 1st extensive action

Chris Adamski
1821169_web1_AP_19287075519156
AP
Pittsburgh Steelers rookie running back Benny Snell runs the ball as Los Angeles Chargers defensive end Isaac Rochell tries to stop him during the second half of last week’s game. The game was Snell’s first extensive action on offense as an NFL player.

Benny Snell was an accomplished and decorated college running back at Kentucky. But before last week, it was fair to question his NFL bona fides.

Snell’s performance against the Los Angeles Chargers seemingly have put any such concerns to rest as far as the Pittsburgh Steelers are concerned.

In his first extensive action as a running back in an NFL regular season game, Snell had 17 carries for 75 yards and added one catch for 14 yards (he had another 17-yard reception called back by penalty); he did his part to help close out a Steelers’ 24-17 victory.

“I’m not surprised of that performance,” coach Mike Tomlin said. “Sometimes it’s just a man and an opportunity. And we have seen signs of that. We have talked openly here about his level of production on special teams and that being an indicator of offensive or defensive readiness in a lot of instances with young guys. But we’re not surprised he was able at all.”

Some might have been, though, after watching Snell’s running in six games in uniform for the Steelers heading into that game. Before Sunday and outside of a 23-yard carry he had during a Week 2 rush, Snell had 33 NFL carries (counting the preseason) for 60 yards. He also failed on a pair of third-and-1 carries.

No such worries against the Chargers, as Snell had no carries for negative yardage and just one that did not gain at least a yard.

“Benny was Benny,” running backs coach Eddie Faulkner said. “As they say, Benny Snell football. He’s a downhill runner, he’s physical, he’s got a lot of passion. I love being around him, he wants to be good. It means a lot to him, and he will just continue to get better.

Snell had a school-record 3,873 rushing yards over three seasons at Kentucky. But some draftniks believed he lacked the burst and speed needed at the NFL level. He also wasn’t as accomplished as a pass-catcher, and NFL schemes require pass protection and blocking.

Faulkner complimented Snell on the strides he has made in those areas. He’s also been pleased with how Snell has embraced special teams. As the grandson of a former NFL player and son of a pro football running back (Ben Snell Sr. played in the XFL and World League) and as a standout in the SEC (school-record 3,873 rushing yards), perhaps Snell could have shunned the duties of covering and blocking for punts and kickoffs.

“Benny wants to be a great player, and so he is champing at the bit to get out there,” Faulkner said. “But he also understands that everybody has a skillet in that room, everybody brings something different to the table and he brings something to that table.

“You saw that start to show up on Sunday night. He’s continuing to work to gain the trust of the coaches and gain the trust of myself, and Sunday was a big step in it. The future is very, very bright for that young man, I think he’s going to be a really good football player.”

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.