Big names left, although Steelers may have to wait to get one | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Big names left, although Steelers may have to wait to get one

Joe Rutter
1077244_web1_AP_19069049666404
AP
Temple defensive back Rock Ya-Sin runs a drill during the NFL football scouting combine, Monday, March 4, 2019, in Indianapolis. (AP Photo/Darron Cummings) Temple defensive back Rock Ya-Sin runs a drill during the NFL football scouting combine, Monday, March 4, 2019, in Indianapolis. (AP Photo/Darron Cummings)

Although the Pittsburgh Steelers traded away their second-round pick Thursday night, they have the next-best thing when the second day of the NFL Draft is held Friday.

The Steelers still hold the second pick of the third round, which they obtained in the Antonio Brown trade, and they also have the 20th pick in the third, which is the No. 83 overall selection.

Now that the first round is in the books, there could be plenty of options available Friday for the Steelers to address other positional needs, be it by standing pat or trying to trade up into the second round.

The Steelers have eight draft picks left, including three sixth-round selections.

Deandre Baker was the only cornerback selected in the first round, which surely came as a surprise to LSU’s Greedy Williams and Washington’s Byron Murphy – a pair of corners that were mocked to the Steelers in the first round by some analysts.

Another player heavily associated with the Steelers – Temple corner Rock Ya-Sin – also remains on the board as does Kentucky corner Lonnie Johnson Jr.

A trio of talented safeties also made it out of the first round: Washington’s Taylor Rapp, Virginia’s Juan Thornhill and Delaware’s Nassir Adderly.

One of the surprises of the first round was that neither of the Mississippi wide receivers – D.K. Metcalf and A.J. Brown – was picked. They join a group of pass catchers that should go in the second round, a list that includes Ohio State’s Parris Campbell, South Carolina’s Deebo Samuel, Stanford’s J.J. Arcega-Whiteside and Iowa State’s Hakeem Butler.

The Steelers brought a bunch of running backs into UPMC Rooney Sports Complex for predraft visits, and only one back went in the first round: Alabama’s Josh Jacobs. Still on the board are Iowa State’s David Montgomery, Penn State’s Miles Sanders and Alabama’s Damien Harris.

If it’s a pass rusher the Steelers covet, they could find Michigan’s Chase Winovich, a Thomas Jefferson graduate, available in the third round. Penn State’s Shareef Miller is another possibility.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.