ShareThis Page
Blues hoping for 1 last bit of road magic in Game 7 at Boston | TribLIVE.com
NHL

Blues hoping for 1 last bit of road magic in Game 7 at Boston

Associated Press
1279698_web1_1279698-4f537fc29ff6411ba7b0c8c842cfc836
AP
Blues defenseman Vince Dunn skates away from the net after the Bruins scored during the third period of Game 6 of the Stanley Cup Final. The Bruins forced a deciding Game 7 on Wednesday night in Boston.

BOSTON — If the St. Louis Blues beat the Boston Bruins in Game 7, perhaps Steve Hatze Petros should get his name on the Stanley Cup.

He is the NHL schedule-maker, making him the most responsible for a January-March stretch when the Blues didn’t play more than one consecutive home game at a time. It was a virtual 70-day road trip that forced a team with a half-dozen new faces to come together under coach Craig Berube. It also helped them put up a 9-3 road record in the playoffs, and it is a big reason the Blues say they feel totally at home playing for the Cup on Wednesday in Boston.

“It was a time for us to get to know each other better,” center Ryan O’Reilly said. “We got out and got away, got the chance to go to the rink together every day, eat together every day. I think that’s where we found our identity and came together. As you can see throughout the course of the playoffs, we’re confident in the room.

The Blues front office has tried to replicate life on the road by having players stay in a hotel at home, but they are just 6-7 in St. Louis in the playoffs.

“I think when you’re at home, you’re maybe trying to play a little differently at times,” Berube said.

The opening minutes of a 5-1 loss in Game 6 exemplified that. Players abandoned their straightforward approach and got fancy by trying to razzle-dazzle the puck past the Bruins, and when a goal didn’t materialize in the first 10 minutes, momentum went the other way.

That’s exactly how the Bruins like it.

“We came out pretty well,” Boston defenseman Brandon Carlo said. “We’ve had good starts on the forecheck early, playing assertive, being aggressive and staying right on top of them, not backing down from anything, keeping our gaps tight. Forwards are doing a great job on the forecheck and kind of asserting the pace out there.”

Who sets the pace could win Game 7. If it is fast and up and down the ice, advantage Bruins.

“I think we’re a better skating team, and if we’re playing to our pace both skating and moving the puck, I think we’ve taken over a little bit and created more chances, playing better defensively,” Bruins forward Joakim Nordstrom said. “When we’re skating, we’re getting back on pucks better. It, obviously, helps our ‘D’ to break the puck out. Same thing goes up ice. We get on the forecheck a little bit quicker.”

The Blues’ whole game is based on their forecheck — how they put pressure on opposing defensemen and wear them down over the course of a game and a series.

“We’re definitely built to sustain pressure,” Blues winger David Perron said. “When we do that, we can really back off teams and, hopefully, slow down the crowd a little bit.”

Quieting what should be a raucous crowd on hand for the first Stanley Cup Final Game 7 in Boston is easier said than done. St. Louis did that in Game 2 to tie the series and is brimming with confidence, unfazed by the lack of home-ice advantage in the final game of the season.

“We’re excited, and we’re happy to get back on the road,” winger Patrick Maroon said. “I think this where we jell the best.”

The Bruins have won seven of 12 home games in the playoffs. Coach Bruce Cassidy said playing for home-ice advantage all season is for a situation just like this, but the road warrior Blues don’t seem concerned.

“We just seem to like it,” defenseman Carl Gunnarsson said. “We just keep putting up good results on the road. I don’t know why, but it seems to be working for us. We’ll try to keep that going.”

Categories: Sports | NHL
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.