Boston College slows down Pitt’s pass rush | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

Boston College slows down Pitt’s pass rush

Jerry DiPaola
2008744_web1_gtr-Pitt10-113019
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Boston College quarterback Dennis Grosel avoids Pitt’s Salem Brightwell in the third quarter Saturday, Nov. 30, 2019, at Heinz Field.

Boston College found a way to diffuse Pitt’s pass rush, the element that made its defense special through most of the season.

The Eagles didn’t rely too heavily on their passing game while recording a 26-19 victory at Heinz Field.

Quarterback Dennis Grosel completed only 9 of 19 pass attempts for 123 yards and a touchdown to tight end Hunter Long.

It was definitely running back A.J. Dillon’s show for most of the game.


The nation’s No. 3 ground gainer (1,685 yards) — and a Heisman contender if Pitt coach Pat Narduzzi had a vote — carried 32 times for 178 yards. He refused to give the ball back to the Panthers after they inched to within seven points of the lead with 5 minutes, 26 seconds left. He carried eight times for 47 yards to run out the clock.

“We didn’t stop him like we should have,” senior middle linebacker Saleem Brightwell said.

Asked if Pitt’s defense was worn down by the 250-pound Dillon, Brightwell said, “A little bit. Not a lot.”

“If you’re in the game the whole time, you’re going to get fatigued a little bit. I’m not going to say we lost because of that.”

It was unusual for Pitt to allow so many yards on the ground (264). The Panthers came into the game allowing ACC teams an average of only 98.4 per game, tops in the conference.

Defensive tackle Jaylen Twyman, who entered with 10 sacks, shared Pitt’s only sack with Patrick Jones. Twyman said the most recent opponents — Virginia Tech and Boston College — “have been doing a really good job … of attacking us in certain ways that we haven’t really practiced.”

“But we’re going to try and get it right for this bowl game.”

Pitt totaled only four sacks in the past two games after averaging four per game for most of the season.

Getting their kicks in

Pitt handed Boston College six points in the game’s first 12 minutes. Wide receiver Jared Wayne and running back Vincent Davis, both freshmen, lost fumbles. With good field position at the BC 48 and Pitt 38, the Eagles only could convert their good fortune into 29- and 32-yard field goals by Aaron Boumerhi, who ended up with four.

Likewise, Pitt couldn’t handle prosperity. After moving inside the BC 10-yard line twice, the Panthers were forced to settle for 23- and 35-yard field goals by Alex Kessman, who also had four.

Kessman finished the regular season with 20 field goals in 28 attempts, including 16 of his last 18 tries. He led Pitt in scoring with 85 points.

Get the latest news about Pitt football and all things Panthers athletics.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.