ShareThis Page
Breaking down the fantasy impact of an Antonio Brown trade |
Breakfast With Benz

Breaking down the fantasy impact of an Antonio Brown trade

Tim Benz
Associated Press
Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver Antonio Brown warms up before a game against the New England Patriots on Sunday, Dec. 16, 2018.

Antonio Brown posted on Instagram that he is open for business.

Great. He isn’t allowed to conduct that business. But from a fantasy sports standpoint, if Brown is on the move, what would be the most impactful landing spot?

I ask Jeff Erickson of Rotowire about that in our weekly fantasy sports podcast. Plus we examine the impact of the Broncos-Ravens trade. Erickson thinks it is good news for owners who have the remaining Ravens players.

LISTEN: Breaking down fantasy impact of an Antonio Brown trade

What does it mean for the receivers in Denver? Furthermore, what does it mean for Case Keenum?

We also dive into the slow MLB market. Is there any clarity at all to the quagmire of Manny Machado and Bryce Harper’s free agency situation?

And we wrap up last week’s NBA trade action.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.