British Open preview: Possible challenge for Koepka; McIlroy’s homeland pressure; Tiger lays low |
U.S./World Sports

British Open preview: Possible challenge for Koepka; McIlroy’s homeland pressure; Tiger lays low

Tim Benz
Getty Images
Brooks Koepka reacts after putting in to win on the 18th green during the final round of the 2019 PGA Championship at Bethpage Black on May 19, 2019 in Farmingdale, N.Y.

As is always the case when we get ready for a major golf championship, Brian Taylor of Real Golf Radio joins us on the Breakfast With Benz podcast.

Brian comes on to speak with us about the British Open at Royal Portrush in Northern Ireland.

Among the topics we outline:

• Brooks Koepka and his standout play in majors. As good as he is, there’s one hidden challenge on this course that could bother him.

• What’s the backstory on Phil Mickelson’s fasting strategy?

• Portrush has some interesting nuances.

• Dustin Johnson has been playing better than his results. Will he get a payoff this week?

• Rory McIlroy has a ton of pressure on him to win this tournament given his Northern Ireland ties. We debate whether he can handle it.

• Tiger Woods is laying a bit low this week. There may be a reason for that.

• Weather is always a factor in The Open Championship. Wind could be the biggest issue this week. We investigate how the players will battle that.

And, most importantly, we talk about the best matchup on the course: Jena Sims vs. Paulina Gretzky.

LISTEN: Analyzing The Open Championship in Northern Ireland

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.