ShareThis Page
Bro, Beau Bennett predicted Robert Bortuzzo’s huge goal for the Blues | TribLIVE.com
NHL

Bro, Beau Bennett predicted Robert Bortuzzo’s huge goal for the Blues

Matt Rosenberg
1155940_web1_1155940-5b5178f6cfb445da81f340a629b15374
AP
St. Louis Blues’ Robert Bortuzzo celebrates with teammates Robert Thomas (18) and Pat Maroon (7) after scoring a goal against the San Jose Sharks in the second period in Game 2 of the Western Conference finals Monday, May 13, 2019, in San Jose, Calif.

Sure, it’s cliche.

But Beau knows.

Not necessarily how to score goals himself. Or stay healthy.

We know how that went during his Penguins tenure.

But Beau Bennett’s hunch about his good buddy Robert Bortuzzo came true during the Stanley Cup Playoffs on Monday night.

Bennett tweeted a screenshot of a conversation he had with his former Penguins teammate, saying he had a feeling Bortuzzo was going to score a goal during the St. Louis Blues’ playoff series against the Sharks.

And it happened in the Blues’ Game 2, series-tying 4-2 win Monday.

Bortuzzo hadn’t played in the Blues’ final five games of a seven-game series win over the Stars in the conference semifinals. But he cracked the lineup in Games 1 and 2 of the Western Conference finals.

“Bro, I have a feeling you are gonna get in these next games a score a huge goal,” Bennett wrote to Bortuzzo. “Like massive.”

Consider it done.

You want massive? Doesn’t get much more massive than your first-career playoff goal being a game-winner, bro.

Bortuzzo has 14 goals in 335 regular-season games in his career.

Bennett most recently played for Dinamo Minsk of the Kontinental Hockey League in Russia.

Matt Rosenberg is a Tribune-Review assistant multimedia editor. You can contact Matt at 412-320-7937, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | NHL
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.