Brooks Koepka faces long odds as he pursues history at U.S. Open | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World Sports

Brooks Koepka faces long odds as he pursues history at U.S. Open

Associated Press
1279661_web1_1279661-0a32a55448d64a2bacdaee92d68075cb
AP
Brooks Koepka hits out of the bunker on the first hole during a practice round for the U.S. Open at Pebble Beach, Calif.

PEBBLE BEACH, Calif. — Brooks Koepka already should have enough motivation for this U.S. Open.

At stake is a shot at a U.S. Open record not touched in 114 years: three straight victories by Willie Anderson.

On his mind was a Fox Sports preview that Koepka interpreted as another example of him not getting the credit he deserves, another chip on his broad shoulder, another chance to prove everyone wrong.

“A bunch of people on Twitter I think tagged me in it — in the promo — and I guess they were amazed that I wasn’t in it,” Koepka said Tuesday. “I just clicked on the link and watched it. Just kind of shocked. They’ve had over a year to kind of put it out. So I don’t know. Somebody probably got fired over it — or should.”

Was it a slight?

Fox had four U.S. Open promos, three of which included Koepka, one of them devoted entirely to Koepka and the history he can match. The other was entirely about Tiger Woods, the Masters champion who returns to the scene of his record 15-shot victory at Pebble Beach.

Koepka wasn’t clear about what shocked him. If there is any cause for a beef in the Woods promo, it was talk about passing the torch to the next generation and showing images of Rory McIlroy, Dustin Johnson and Jordan Spieth but no Koepka.

The good news for Koepka?

He said it’s getting harder for him to hide when he’s out in public. He can feel eyes on him when he walks into a restaurant, and he’s not sure why all the fuss.

“I just view myself as a regular guy, just like everybody else,” he said. “And I just happen to be really good at golf. And that’s it.”

It was hard not to notice, maybe even appreciate, the interview room. Only six people attended his pre-tournament press conference last year at Shinnecock Hills when he was the defending champion, although it was late on a Wednesday afternoon. This time, it was hard to find six empty seats.

Koepka has everyone’s attention at Pebble Beach. He has won four of his last eight majors, a stretch of success only Woods, Jack Nicklaus and Ben Hogan have equaled in the era of four majors.

Even so, it’s another name that enters the equation this week.

Koepka recalls seeing Anderson’s name on a building in Scotland last summer, right after he won his second U.S. Open. By then, Koepka was vaguely aware the Scottish-born Anderson had won the U.S. Open in 1903-05.

“I just try to put that in the back of my mind,” Koepka said in a tone nearly as flat as his heart rate. “It’s just another golf tournament. I have to go out and do what I’m supposed to do. It’s going to be a tough test this week. We all know that.”

Four players have had a shot at three straight U.S. Open titles since. None came particularly close. The most recent opportunity fell to Curtis Strange in 1990 at Medinah, where a 68 brought him within two shots of the lead until he faded to a 75 in the final round and tied for 21st.

“He says it’s another day, another round, another tournament,” Strange said. “It’s not. It’s the U.S. Open. He’s going for three in a row. But of anyone I’ve seen who walks the walk, it’s Brooks Koepka.

He goes about his business in a professional way every day.”

Koepka realizes history is against him and not just because it has been 104 years since anyone won a third straight U.S. Open.

The last player to win any major three straight times was Peter Thomson in the British Open (1954-56). Take even a stock PGA Tour event, and it has been eight years since Steve Stricker was the last to win the same event three years in a row at the John Deere Classic.

Woods won at least three straight years six times in five tournaments (he had two stretches of three straight wins at Firestone).

“I’m not thinking about it,” Koepka said. “I know the odds are stacked up probably even more against me now to go three in a row than to back it up. It’s hard to win the same event three times in a row.”

Spieth got a close look at Koepka last month at Bethpage Black when they played in the final group of the third round, when Koepka maintained his seven-shot lead with an even-par 70 as the course began to toughen.

Spieth was on a roll like this a few years ago. He won the Masters and U.S. Open was close in the other two majors of 2015. He lost a five-shot lead on the back nine at the Masters the following year. He won the British Open in 2017.

“He may be stoic on the golf course. I think that’s his level of confidence that he has and his level of focus that he’s been on,” Spieth said. “That mentality on the golf course seems to be coming from the confidence in every swing that he’s making. I’ve been in similar situations. And it’s really fun. And it’s also sometimes even more difficult to stay as focused as he’s been able to do.”

Spieth doesn’t like to hear phrases like Koepka being on a run because it speaks more of good fortune than simply good golf.

“This isn’t just a run. This is who he is,” Spieth said. “And he’s going to be a force to be reckoned with for decades. So get used to it.”

Categories: Sports | US-World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.