Cleveland Browns ban wrong fan for life for pouring beer on Titans player, report says | TribLIVE.com
NFL

Cleveland Browns ban wrong fan for life for pouring beer on Titans player, report says

Zach Brendza
1660232_web1_1660232-278048711ac0478aa6a15ef33c226915
AP
Cleveland Browns wide receiver Odell Beckham Jr. is introduced before a game against the Tennessee Titans on Sunday, Sept. 8, 2019, in Cleveland.

If the Week 1 loss wasn’t bad enough for the Cleveland Browns, this might make things worse.

During the game against the Tennessee Titans, a fan poured beer on Titans players after the Tennessee defense ran an interception back for a touchdown.

The Browns claim to have identified the culprit, but — according to Cleveland Scene — they have the wrong pourer.

The report says Cleveland Browns vice president of ticket sales & service Bob Sivik called Eric Smith, claiming that Smith had been identified as the fan in question for the FirstEnergy Stadium incident.

The report says Smith tried to convince Sivik of his innocence, saying not only was he not at the game Sunday, but he hadn’t been to one in nearly a decade. He also was DJing a wedding while the Browns-Titans game was going on.

These rationales didn’t convince Sivik, Cleveland Scene writes, as he claimed Smith had been caught on multiple cameras around the stadium. The stadium had also matched his tattoos and claimed he had bought a ticket.

Sivik informed Smith he was banned for life.

Cleveland Music Group, Smith’s employer, defended him and corroborated his story, posting video of him working a wedding.

The Browns have not publicly commented on the incident.

Zach Brendza is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Zach at 724-850-1288, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | NFL
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.