ShareThis Page
Bruce Arians on criticism of Steelers’ Ben Roethlisberger: ‘Guys need to have thicker skin’ | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Bruce Arians on criticism of Steelers’ Ben Roethlisberger: ‘Guys need to have thicker skin’

Chris Adamski
936434_web1_Bruce-Arians-2011

Add Bruce Arians to the list of people who is rushing to the defense of Ben Roethlisberger in recent days.

Arians, hired as coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers in January, was Roethlisberger’s offensive coordinator with the Pittsburgh Steelers from 2007-11. The two are known to have been close, often golfing together even after Arians’ departure from the Steelers.

Speaking in Arizona at the NFL annual meetings, Arians was asked about Roethlisberger’s leadership qualities, which have come into question after criticism from former teammates Antonio Brown and Le’Veon Bell this offseason.

Arians told The Athletic that Roethlisberger is “one of the best I’ve ever been around.”

“Guys have to have thicker skin, man,” Arians said, according to ESPN, in reference to Bell and Brown. “(Roethlisberger is) the leader. He’s the guy. Early in his career everybody said, ‘Hey, you’re not vocal enough.’ But you had Jerome Bettis and Alan Faneca and you didn’t have to be. It’s his team.“

Arians coached the Indianapolis Colts and Arizona Cardinals after his 2012 firing by the Steelers. Last season, he was a commentator for CBS. Arians was coordinator in Pittsburgh during Brown’s first two seasons in the NFL, but Brown did not become a starter until the season after Arians left.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at cadamski@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.