Bud Dupree fined $21K for hit on Seahawks’ Russell Wilson | TribLIVE.com

Bud Dupree fined $21K for hit on Seahawks’ Russell Wilson

Joe Rutter
Pittsburgh Steelers linebacker Bud Dupree, left, defends against New England Patriots wide receiver Josh Gordon in the second half of an NFL football game, Sunday, Sept. 8, 2019, in Foxborough, Mass. (AP Photo/Steven Senne)

SAN FRANCISCO — Bud Dupree didn’t get flagged for a helmet-to-helmet hit on Seattle Seahawks quarterback Russell Wilson last Sunday, but he will be a little lighter in the wallet because of the transgression.

The NFL on Saturday levied a $21,056 fine against the Pittsburgh Steelers outside linebacker for his hit on Wilson with 8:54 left in the fourth quarter of the Steelers’ 28-26 loss to the Seahawks at Heinz Field.

Dupree’s hit on Wilson came on the play in which the Seahawks successfully challenged an incomplete pass, arguing that safety Terrell Edmunds committed pass interference on receiver Tyler Lockett. Given a first down and prime field position, the Seahawks scored a touchdown to take a 28-19 lead with 7:22 remaining.

“I thought it was a little high, but it’s part of the game,” Wilson said after the game. “You get back up and keep playing.”

Dupree said he apologized to Wilson after the play.

The Steelers (0-2) play the San Francisco 49ers (2-0) on Sunday at Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, Calif.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.