Bushy Run’s season comes to shocking end | TribLIVE.com
Other Local

Bushy Run’s season comes to shocking end

Paul Schofield
1437844_web1_GTR-d31final-08-071719

Bushy Run entered the Pennsylvania American Legion Region 7 tournament on a roll. Its pitchers didn’t allow a run in five District 31 playoff games.

But after an opening-round win, Bushy Run’s season came to a sudden end two days later.

Beech Creek scored four runs in the top of the fifth as a three-run double by Cayde McCloskey broke open a close game and propelled Beech Creek to an 8-4 victory Sunday at Latrobe’s Legion-Keener Field.

The loss came a day after Bushy Run lost to Hempfield East, 12-2.

Bushy Run coach Scott Peyman felt his team was built to make a run in the tournament because of its deep pitching staff. After Tyler Horvat gave them a strong performance in Game 1 against Mifflin County, starting pitchers Bobby Kusinsky and Max Pisi weren’t as sharp in the next two games.

McCloskey’s double came after Bushy Run pitchers walked three consecutive batters.

Asher Corl had a double and single for Beech Creek.

Kusinsky doubled, and Mario Disso and Hunter DeStefano had two hits each for Bushy Run, which out-hit Beech Creek, 10-9.

Rain played havoc with the rest of the schedule Sunday. The 2 p.m. game between Bedford and Mifflin County was pushed back to 8 p.m. and played at Latrobe High School.

The winners’ bracket game between Hempfield East and Latrobe is scheduled for 11 a.m. Monday at Legion-Keener or Latrobe.

Region 7 tournament director Jason Bush said the decision on where that game will be played will come Monday morning after checking the weather and field conditions.

Bush hopes to get back on schedule if weather permits.

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Other Local
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.