Canada scores buzzer-beating goal to advance to World Championship semifinals |

Canada scores buzzer-beating goal to advance to World Championship semifinals

Jonathan Bombulie
Switzerland’s goalkeeper Leonardo Genoni, center, watches the puck goes in for Canada to tie 2-2 in the last seconds of regular time during the Ice Hockey World Championships quarterfinal match between Canada and Switzerland at the Steel Arena in Kosice, Slovakia, Thursday, May 23, 2019.

Canada advanced to the semifinals of the IIHF World Championships on Thursday on a buzzer-beating goal by New Jersey Devils defenseman Damon Severson.

Trailing 2-1 to Switzerland with Penguins goalie Matt Murray pulled, Severson scored on a deflected point shot that slid over the goal line with 0.4 seconds left in regulation. Mark Stone scored about five minutes into the 10-minute, three-on-three overtime period.

Murray made 22 saves, including four in overtime, to lead Canada to the 3-2 victory.

In another quarterfinal, Evgeni Malkin set up the game-winning goal to lead Russia past the United States, 4-3. Malkin made a cross-ice, backhand pass to set up a Mikhail Grigorenko and give Russia a 4-2 lead in the third period.

Dominik Simon recorded an assist as the Czech Republic scored a 5-1 victory over Germany to reach the semifinals.

Patric Hornqvist and Marcus Pettersson bowed out when Sweden dropped a 5-4 overtime decision to Finland. Hornqvist scored his seventh goal in eight games in the tournament in the loss.

In Saturday’s semifinals, Canada will meet the Czech Republic and Russia will face Finland.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.