Penguins turn to Casey DeSmith in goal against Sharks |

Penguins turn to Casey DeSmith in goal against Sharks

Joe Rutter
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Rangers’ Mats Zuccarello beats Penguins goaltender Casey DeSmith in the second period Sunday, Feb. 17, 2019 at PPG Paints Arena.

With the Pittsburgh Penguins playing amid a stretch of five games in eight days, coach Mike Sullivan figured it was the right time to get backup Casey DeSmith another start.

DeSmith will start in goal Thursday night when the Penguins play the San Jose Sharks, the team with the second-most points in the Western Conference.

DeSmith’s most recent start came on Sunday in a 6-5 over the New York Rangers. Matt Murray was in net Tuesday night in the Penguins’ 4-3 win at New Jersey. DeSmith’s previous start was Feb. 9 at Tampa Bay.

“From a logistic standpoint, we’re playing a lot of hockey this week, and we needed two guys,” Sullivan said after morning skate. “We are trying to manage those two guys so they can be at their best, and they both give us a chance to win.

“The other aspect is Casey has been very good in the starts he’s had recently.”

DeSmith will carry a 14-10-5 record in 33 starts and a 2.82 goals-against average into the game. Murray is 18-10-1 with a 2.94 GAA in 30 starts. DeSmith has a slightly better save percentage – .915 to .913.

With DeSmith starting against San Jose, Murray could be in line to start Saturday in Philadelphia in the Stadium Series game at Lincoln Financial Field.

Sullivan made no changes to his line pairings at morning skate, which means forwards Garrett Wilson and Teddy Blueger and defenseman Juuso Riikola could be scratched against San Jose.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.