ShareThis Page
Chartiers Valley grad Coyne rediscovers love for track and field at IUP |
District College

Chartiers Valley grad Coyne rediscovers love for track and field at IUP

IUP athletics
Chartiers Valley grad Kristina Coyne is a track and field athlete at IUP.

At the recent PSAC indoor track and field championships, IUP’s Kristina Coyne tied for eighth in the high jump with a leap of 1.55 meters — about 5 feet, 1 inch.

The Chartiers Valley grad admitted the mark was nothing special. It was a height she said she was achieving in middle school.

These days, however, Coyne is less concerned with numbers. Her last hurrah as an athlete is all about rediscovering her love for competing.

Coyne’s finish at the PSAC indoors came three years after her performance at the Mid-American Conference indoor championships when she was a junior at Eastern Michigan. Coincidentally, she took eighth in the high jump (1.69 meters) to score one point for the Eagles.

Eastern Michigan won the title by one point.

The point also made Coyne eligible for more scholarship money for her senior year. She initially was given 50 percent tuition and a book scholarship but had to earn more financial aid by scoring in the conference championship.

Despite finally achieving that goal, Coyne had soured on Eastern Michigan.

“I have no regrets about going there,” she said. “I think I had a lot of experiences that a lot of people are never going to get to experience. I got to be an athlete on the top level.

“But it’s a business, and you’re there to perform. And when you don’t, it doesn’t always work out the way you hope. When you have a coach who doesn’t care about you more than the numbers, it’s tough.”

Coming out of Chartiers Valley, where she also played soccer, volleyball, basketball and even kicked for the football team, Coyne had several opportunities. Cal (Pa.) offered her a full scholarship to play volleyball and run track. Other schools sought her athletic prowess as well, but she casually dismissed them all.

“I didn’t give them the time of day because I had too much pride,” she said.

In other words, Coyne was too caught up in being able to call herself a Division I athlete. But after three years of the grind at Eastern Michigan, she decided she had enough.

Coyne left EMU, returned home and started working at an early childhood development center. She knew, however, she couldn’t fulfill her goal of becoming an elementary school teacher without a degree. So she enrolled at IUP despite losing several credits in the transfer and having to reclassify as a junior academically.

Track and field wasn’t even a thought until a conversation with a transfer counselor changed that. Coyne, 24, discovered she had one year of athletic eligibility remaining, and she took it.

During indoor season, she competed in high jump, 60-meter hurdles and triple jump. At the Susquehanna Challenge on Feb. 2, she won the hurdles, placed third in the triple jump and tied for third in the high jump.

Coyne said her reward was something bigger than any medals she earned.

“It’s so refreshing to be able to come and do track and field and find the love for it again and the fun in it,” she said. “Even if I’m not putting up the marks I used to put up, it doesn’t define me anymore. I’m doing it for the right reasons.”

Outdoor season is right around the corner, and Coyne is eager to get going. She wants to do whatever she can to help the Crimson Hawks be successful while, at the same time, focusing on the joy of competition.

And she believes other high school athletes can learn a lesson from her journey.

“It doesn’t matter what division you’re at,” Coyne said. “If you’re good enough, you’re going to make a difference. If you get to put on your uniform and do what you love, that should be the focus.”

Chuck Curti is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | College-District
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.