Chase Elliott wins Dover pole, but all talk centers on qualifying speeds | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World Sports

Chase Elliott wins Dover pole, but all talk centers on qualifying speeds

Associated Press

DOVER, Del. — Chase Elliott took a solo run on the track for qualifying and was alone atop the Dover speed chart.

Elliott followed his first win of the season with a pole at Dover International Speedway, topping the speed chart on a blistering day at the track with a record 165.960 mph in NASCAR’s first qualifying session since it reverted to single-lap runs.

Elliott, NASCAR’s most popular driver, won last week at Talladega and kept the good times rolling Friday when he led a 1-2 front row for Hendrick Motorsports with William Byron. Elliott also finished first again at Dover: He won the fall race last season in his No. 9 Chevrolet.

“Hopefully, we can keep it going in the right direction,” Elliott said.

The speeds on the mile-concrete track might be going a dangerous direction for the field in Sunday’s Cup race. The new package this season had cars coming to Dover with 750 horsepower and more downforce that led to each car seemingly going faster than the last earlier in the day. Brad Keselowski held the track record of 164.444 mph, and 23 cars topped that speed during Friday’s lone practice session.

“If it’s a surprise to anybody, it’s not a surprise to the race teams,” 2014 NASCAR champion Kevin Harvick said. “I would argue that fast is easier this time around than it was last year with a bunch less downforce. It’s a lot faster, but, in my opinion, it’s a fair amount easier.”

Kyle Busch said there was “no question” the cars had hit dangerous speeds at Dover.

“If you have a problem here with the speeds we are carrying into the corner, it is going to hurt,” he said. “The faster you go, the harder you are going to hit the wall. The IndyCar guys were flying around here, and they don’t come here anymore, because it was too fast, too dangerous for them. Eventually, there comes a point where it becomes too fast for a stock car, too.”

Elliott claimed the official mark in single-lap qualifying. NASCAR for more than five years has used a group qualifying format, but it was abandoned this week and it was back to single-car laps to set the field.

NASCAR was adamant it was trying to keep qualifying entertaining for fans because single-car runs are tedious, but teams continued to find loopholes that made the format a farce. Most drivers waited until the very last moment to pull off pit lane for their qualifying run, and all 12 drivers in the final round at California in March missed the cutoff point to even register a lap.

Elimination-style rounds also were cut. NASCAR said the single-car qualifying format will be in effect for the rest of the season, though group qualifying will remain in place at road courses.

“Qualifying, in my opinion, has been too much of a topic of conversation,” Harvick said. “The way that qualifying is now across all three series is going to be good to take away the conversation. We don’t need to be talking about qualifying, especially on a week like this especially after you had Chase Elliott win a race. Here we are, talking about qualifying instead of celebrating our most popular driver’s most recent win.”

Kyle Larson, Joey Logano and fellow Hendrick driver Alex Bowman round out the top five. The top five qualifiers bettered Keselowski’s mark.


Categories: Sports | US-World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.