Chase for Tom Herman ends well for Texas, LSU | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World Sports

Chase for Tom Herman ends well for Texas, LSU

Associated Press
1629942_web1_1629942-f4f61e31b79c472b8103a0a13c3a8ad2
AP
In this Nov. 23, 2018, photo, Texas coach Tom Herman works the sideline during the first half of a game against Kansas, in Lawrence, Kan. Herman and LSU coach Ed Orgeron like the colors they’ll be wearing Saturday night when No. 6 Tigers meet No. 9 Texas in one of the top nonconference matchups of the 2019 season. (AP Photo/Orlin Wagner)
1629942_web1_1629942-a48ef92b53374cd2b74504e19f056c37
AP
In this Aug. 31, 2019, photo, LSU coach Ed Orgeron gestures before a game against Georgia Southern, in Baton Rouge, La. (AP Photo/Tyler Kaufman, File)

AUSTIN, Texas — The chase was on for Tom Herman.

In late 2016, Texas and LSU were eyeing the young hotshot coach from Houston until a wild Thanksgiving weekend that included a Tigers win, a Longhorns loss and leaked details of contract negotiations swung Herman to Texas and pushed LSU to elevate interim coach Ed Orgeron to the top job in Baton Rouge.

It wasn’t necessarily friendly, and the last few hours were tense. There were some harsh words from LSU to Herman’s agent as school officials thought he was trying to start a bidding war before everyone decided they had hired the coach they wanted all along.

As for Herman and Orgeron, they like the colors they will wear Saturday night when the No. 6 Tigers visit No. 9 Texas in one of the top nonconference matchups of the season.

“Don’t care,” Orgeron said this week when asked about LSU’s pursuit of Herman. “I’m happy to be the coach at LSU. This is about our football players against their football players. None of that means anything.”

Herman wasn’t going there either.

“This is my dream job,” Herm said. “I’d prefer not to waste anybody’s time talking about something that happened three years ago.”

Things could have been much different.

The two programs were facing rough times and needed to make the right hire. Texas was winding up its third straight losing season under Charlie Strong. LSU had fired Les Miles earlier in the season but went 5-2 with Orgeron as interim coach.

Each Texas loss increased pressure to fire Strong. LSU had already cast a long and wide net in search of a permanent coach.

Orgeron was winning, but he’also was fired from Mississippi in 2007 with three-year record of 10-25 and a winless final season in the SEC. He went 6-2 as interim head coach at USC in 2013 but was passed over for the top job and eventually landed on Miles’ staff at LSU.

Herman was college football’s rising star at Houston, where he was elevating a Conference USA program with wins over Florida State and Oklahoma. That success grabbed Texas’ attention, and it kept getting stronger with each Longhorns loss.

Mike Perrin, then Texas athletic director, is from Houston. He heard and saw the Herman hype at full volume.

“ ‘H-Town takeover’ they called it,” Perrin said. “I watched the energy around that organization. He was high on my radar.”

Plus Herman had Texas roots. He was a graduate assistant on Mack Brown’s staff and knew all the fertile highways and byways of recruiting the Lone Star State.

But Texas didn’t have an opening yet, and LSU was already probing Herman’s interest in joining the mighty SEC. Things didn’t get crazy until the final week of the regular season.

Texas fans hit their boiling point when the Longhorns lost at Kansas. But Strong still had a final game to play and if he could beat TCU to finish 6-6 and get to a bowl game, there was a good chance the first black head coach in program history could keep his job.

Then, on Thanksgiving, shortly before Orgeron and LSU went on the road and pummeled Texas A&M, the story broke that LSU was close to a deal with Herman. LSU won the game, but the report made for some uncomfortable hours at LSU and Texas.

LSU was angered by the media leak. Texas backers who wanted Herman were in agony because they were about to miss their guy. The next day, Texas lost to TCU, pushing Perrin and Texas into overdrive on Herman.

Perrin, who had seen the Herman-LSU connection splashed on social media — “I read Twitter, too,” he said — was pressing overnight for a Texas deal with Herman.

“The pace was pretty intense,” Perrin said. “My impression was he always wanted to come to the University of Texas.”

By morning, LSU and Herman had cut off negotiations. Orgeron was winning and wanted to be there.

“At that point, we huddled and said, ‘Why are we going over there? We know who we want. Texas knows who they want. Let’s call it a day,’ because your gut is always right,” New Orleans businessman and LSU board member Stephen Perry.

The coaching announcements unfolded over a matter of hours. Strong was fired on a Saturday morning. By the afternoon, Orgeron was hired at LSU and Texas announced the Herman hire soon after.

Both schools see their choices as the right ones.

Since getting the promotion, Orgeron is 20-7 and 2-1 in bowl games with the Tigers. Herman is 18-10 and 2-0 in bowls with the Longhorns. Both programs finished in top 10 last season and started there this season. Both are eyeing potential runs for the College Football Playoff.

“Not taking anything away from Tom, he’s a great coach as well,” LSU linebacker Patrick Queen said. “But I just feel like coach O fits us better. That’s who we want. … That’s who we’re going to fight for.”

Categories: Sports | US-World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.