Christian Coleman earns title of world’s fastest man |

Christian Coleman earns title of world’s fastest man

Associated Press
Christian Coleman (left), of the United States, crosses the finish line to win the men’s 100-meter race ahead of silver medalist Justin Gatlin, of the United States during the World Athletics Championships in Doha, Qatar, Saturday, Sept. 28, 2019.

DOHA, Qatar — Everyone knew exactly where to find Christian Coleman this time.

The man whose whereabouts have left the track and field world scratching its collective head for the past month burst out of the blocks Saturday night and powered to the early lead.

He got stronger from there, blowing away seven other entrants in the 100-meter world championship race and leaving little doubt about who will be chased, and who will do the chasing, in a reworked track landscape without Usain Bolt.

Coleman’s time, 9.76 seconds, might not have turned many heads, but this should: He beat Justin Gatlin to the line by .13 seconds — an entire body length. That marked the biggest blowout in a 100-meter race at worlds or the Olympics since 2011.

“This is something I’ll never take for granted,” Coleman said. “The opportunity to come out here and compete. And then to be crowned world champion?”

Doesn’t get much better than that.

But Coleman’s breakout night had few similarities to any Bolt dominated over his 10 years of record-setting fun.

Even on the races everyone knew he’d win, Bolt brought the entertainment— and some drama — taking forever to unfurl his 6-foot-5 frame from the blocks, then working the first 50 meters to grab the lead, then leaving everyone hanging at the end to see what that clock might say.

Coleman, on the other hand, never trailed — the legs on his muscle-bound, 5-9 frame pumping like pistons from start to finish.

The differences on the second evening at the air-conditioned track in Doha weren’t restricted to the men’s 100.

Earlier, Jamaica earned its first gold medal of the championship. Not in a traditional sprint, but in the long jump, courtesy of Tajay Gayle, who won the country’s first world-championship medal in a field event.

The Netherlands, home of speed skating and sprinter Dafne Schippers, took home its first 10,000-meter gold on the shoes of Ethiopian-born Sifan Hassan, who is making a smooth transition from middle distance to the long races.

And the United States found a surprising, maybe shocking, gold medal in one of the very few spots it hasn’t dominated at some point in track and field’s long history — women’s hammer throw. It came courtesy of a softball player-turned-throwing star named DeAnna Price whose first experience hurling that big piece of metal resulted in her getting bonked in the head.

“I remember literally dropping it and saying, ‘I’m never doing this again,’” she said.

A day earlier, Latrobe graduate Hanna Green failed to advance to the semifinals in the 800. Coming off a personal best of 1:58.19 at the U.S. championships in July, Green suffered a hamstring injury during practice earlier in the week. She dropped back in the final 100 and finished last in her heat (2:04.37).

Could anyone have blamed Coleman for thinking the same five weeks ago when his name started showing up in the headlines?

The leak of information about his troubles with the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency opened up a spigot of allegations and recriminations that followed him to Doha and could stay with him on the road to next year’s Tokyo Olympics.

“It’s pretty disturbing to know people out there say things and they don’t know me personally at all,” Coleman said. “But at this point, I’m over it.”

His case involved three “whereabouts failures” that occurred between June 6, 2018 and April 26, 2019. Three failures in a 12-month span can trigger an anti-doping violation.

But the rules are technical, and there’s a difference between not being where you say you’re going to be and simply failing to update the app that tells authorities where you can be found. Because of those details, Coleman’s first violation was backdated to April 1, 2018 — the start of the three-month period at which the original information is supposed to be inputted. That took his first violation out of the 12-month window and compelled USADA to drop the case.

It allowed Coleman to race here in Doha, but couldn’t strip away the words “Coleman” and “Doping” that appeared in headlines worldwide.

Coleman, who has been subject to more than 20 doping tests over the past two years and never been hit with a positive, posted a long YouTube video to explain the situation. He came to Doha thinking that would calm things down. It hasn’t, and at this point — with the 200-meter qualifying starting Sunday and relays on his plate later next week — he’s done trying.

“I’m not spending much time trying to explain things to people who aren’t interested in the truth,” he said.

Best, perhaps, to let his running do the talking.

With Tokyo a mere 10 months away, Gatlin, who came in as defending champion, bronze medalist Andre De Grasse and Yohan Blake of Jamaica found out just how much room they have to make up.

When did Coleman know he had it wrapped up?

“From the start,” he said. “I got up on top of everybody. … I knew that if I was being patient, the end would take care of itself.”

At the end, Coleman let out a primal scream, then pounded his chest twice and jogged a half-circle around the track, shouting into the stands. He blew a couple of kisses toward the heavens and kneeled for a brief second.

The half-full, 40,000-seat stadium was emptying. It was a far cry from the Bolt celebrations, all infused with reggae music, Jamaican flags, plenty of preening, picture-taking and the bow-and-arrow pose.

“There are so many people doing really good things right now,” Coleman said. “Everyone should be celebrated. It doesn’t have to be one face. I’m happy to part of that group.”

Fair enough. But on the first big night of track without Bolt, Coleman found himself separated from that group, not running with it.

Categories: Sports
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.