ShareThis Page
Cleveland blows no-hitter in 9th inning |

Cleveland blows no-hitter in 9th inning

Samson X Horne

The Cleveland Indians on Thursday night waited until the final inning of a game against the Toronto Blue Jays to sabotage what would have been the team’s first no-hitter in 38 years.

Blue Jays shortstop Freddy Galvis said “No” to the no-no via a single to center field to start the ninth.

Had Cleveland completed the game without allowing a hit, the accomplishment officially would have been called a combined no-hitter because more than one pitcher was active.

Starting pitcher Trevor Bauer pitched seven innings where he struck out eight and walked six. He threw 117 pitches before heading to the dugout.

Reliever John Edwards pitched two-thirds of an inning, striking out two and walking two.

Brad Hand, who got the save, struck out three. However, he blew the no-hitter after allowing the hit from Galvis.

Hand also allowed an earned run.

The Tribe still came away victorious with a 4-1 victory.

Oh, and that last no-hitter?

According to the Associated Press, that came courtesy of Len Barker, who threw a perfect game in 1981 against — guess who?


Samson X Horne is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Samson at 412-320-7845, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | MLB
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.