Close finishes galore with mixed results for Big Ten |

Close finishes galore with mixed results for Big Ten

Associated Press
Maryland quarterback Josh Jackson and the Terrapins were one of the Big Ten teams to have a close finish Saturday, losing to Temple, 20-17.

EAST LANSING, Mich. — Mark Dantonio will have to wait a bit for his next milestone after the last couple of minutes went terribly wrong for Michigan State.

James Franklin and Kirk Ferentz were a bit more fortunate, but they had reason to sweat while Penn State and Iowa were pushed to the limit by in-state rivals.

On a wild Saturday in the Big Ten, a half-dozen games came down to the last few plays. Penn State, Iowa and Minnesota managed to pull through, while Michigan State, Illinois and Maryland fell short. It was a day that certainly drove home the notion that there’s a fine line between winning and losing.

“The outcome of the football game had a lot of things going on, some things we could control and some things we can’t control,” Dantonio said after his Spartans lost 10-7 to Arizona State. “Too many missed opportunities.”

Dantonio is tied with Duffy Daugherty for the most victories by a Michigan State coach. He was on the verge of standing alone with that record when the Spartans led 7-3 late in the game, but Michigan State’s defense finally cracked, allowing Arizona State quarterback Jayden Daniels to run for a first down on fourth-and-13. The winning touchdown came soon after that, with just under a minute remaining.

The Spartans drove back into field goal range, but after spiking the ball to stop the clock with 11 seconds left, they appeared indecisive. The field goal team had to rush out, and although Matt Coghlin made a kick that appeared to tie it, Michigan State had too many men on the field. The re-kick missed.

Illinois’ matchup with Eastern Michigan also came down to a kick, and it had to be a helpless feeling for the Illini after EMU drove into position for a 24-yard field goal at the end. Chad Ryland made it to hand Illinois a 34-31 loss.

Maryland also lost after an encouraging victory over Syracuse in its previous game. The Terrapins lost 20-17 to Temple after their offense failed to reach the end zone on a couple great opportunities late. Down 20-15, Maryland took over at the Temple 4-yard line after a long punt return. Four straight runs failed to reach the end zone, and the Terps turned the ball over on downs.

A shanked punt gave Maryland the ball back at the Temple 10, but the Terrapins couldn’t score then either.

Maryland dropped out of the Top 25 on Sunday, and so did Michigan State.

Iowa could have faced a similar fate, but Ferentz’s Hawkeyes held off Iowa State 18-17. Iowa sealed that game by recovering a punt that bounced off an Iowa State player.

Penn State had a close call as well in a 17-10 win over Pitt. It wasn’t Franklin who faced the big coaching decision in this one — but rather his counterpart, Pitt’s Pat Narduzzi.

Down by seven, the Panthers had first-and-goal from the 1 in the fourth quarter, but after two incompletions and a failed run, they attempted a field goal — and missed with 4:54 remaining.

Pitt got the ball again but never made it back to the red zone.

If there’s one team that’s used to that type of tense finish, it’s Minnesota. The Gophers beat South Dakota State by seven and Fresno State in two overtimes. Then they edged Georgia Southern on Saturday, 35-32, scoring the winning touchdown with 13 seconds left.

“There were times we did everything to lose the game. There were times we did everything to win the game,” Gophers coach P.J. Fleck said. “I believe in my players. I believe in my team.”

Categories: Sports | College
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.