CMU’s Jason Li up for prestigious Jack Nicklaus Award |
District College

CMU’s Jason Li up for prestigious Jack Nicklaus Award

Bill Beckner
Sewickley Academy grad Jason Li is a golfer at Carnegie Mellon.

Carnegie Mellon sophomore Jason Li is a semifinalist — one of 30 players nationally — for the prestigious NCAA Division III Jack Nicklaus National Player of the Year Award.

Li, a Sewickley Academy graduate, is having one of the best scoring seasons in the country. He was selected by the Golf Coaches Association of America. He recently was named the University Athletic Association Player of the Year.

With a 72.5 scoring average, Li leads the Tartans in 21 rounds, and tied the school record with a 4-under-par 67 at the Strimer Memorial Invitational. He had four rounds in the 60s and eight sub-par rounds.

Li helped CMU to its third consecutive NCAA Division III championships appearance. The finals will be Tuesday through Friday at Keene Trace Golf Club in Nicholasville, Ky.

The Nicklaus Award recognizes the top players at the Division I, II, III, NAIA and NJCAA levels. Finalists will be announced at the GCAA Division III National Awards Banquet Tuesday.

Nicklaus Award winners will be unveiled May 30. Jack Nicklaus will present the awards during the final round of his Memorial Tournament at Muirfield Village Golf Club.

There’s more: The five recipients will compete in the Barbasol Shootout for an exemption into the PGA TOUR’s Barbasol Championship, July 18-21 at the Champions at Keene Trace. The Barbasol Shootout will be June 1 at The Ohio State University Golf Club’s Scarlet Course in Columbus, Ohio, where Nicklaus played his college golf.

Bill Beckner Jr. is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bill by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | College-District
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.