ShareThis Page
-Top College

WVU braces for pair of QBs at Kansas State

| Friday, Oct. 25, 2013, 9:23 p.m.
West Virginia quarterback Clint Trickett (9) celebrates the 30-21 upset victory over Oklahoma State on Saturday, Sept. 28, 2013, at Milan Puskar Stadium in Morgantown, W.Va.
Barry Reeger | Tribune-Review
West Virginia quarterback Clint Trickett (9) celebrates the 30-21 upset victory over Oklahoma State on Saturday, Sept. 28, 2013, at Milan Puskar Stadium in Morgantown, W.Va.

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — Considering the problems West Virginia has had the past two weeks preparing for quarterbacks Bryce Petty of Baylor and Davis Webb of Texas Tech, it would seem to be a Herculean task that lies before them in Kansas State, which offers a “two-headed quarterback monster.”

Petty and Webb led offenses that combined to score 110 points on West Virginia in two games, completing 53 of 75 passes — 70.6 percent — for 809 yards and three touchdowns and but one interception.

But when West Virginia walks on the field at Kansas State on Saturday, it will do so unsure whether the Wildcats will have Daniel Sams, their running quarterback, or Jake Waters, their passing quarterback, at the controls of their spread offense.

A year ago the teams met in West Virginia, and the quarterbacks were front and center. K-State's Collin Klein would account for seven touchdowns in a 55-14 victory over Geno Smith and the Mountaineers.

This season WVU used three quarterbacks before settling on Florida State transfer Clint Trickett.

Sams is the team's leading rusher and third in rushing in the Big 12 with 87 yards per game, while Waters is the fourth-leading passer in the conference at 172.7 yards per game.

This has presented a problem for defenses but may be more of a problem for coach Bill Snyder, who has not yet created an identity for his team.

“Offensively they are kind of searching a little bit because they are dealing with the same thing a lot of teams are dealing with because they are replacing a fantastic quarterback, much like we are, and are trying to figure out who is going to be the guy and how you are going to structure things around him,” WVU coach Dana Holgorsen said.

That said, Holgorsen senses that Sams is edging in front in the quarterback battle.

“It looks to me like they have been settling in on Sams a little bit. They are two different-type guys; they do different-type schemes with the two of them. We will have to prepare for both.

“Sams presents problems from an athletic point of view. We will have to keep him in check. He will hurt you with his feet.”

WVU has had more success defending quarterbacks who are run oriented rather than the pass-happy variety of quarterback, a trend Snyder couldn't have missed in his film studies, given he had an extra week to prepare due to a bye.

As important as WVU being able to defend K-State's quarterbacks is the Mountaineers' ability to throw the ball against the Wildcats, who stymied Baylor's strong running game last week.

Bob Hertzel is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me