ShareThis Page
District Colleges

Seton Hill sees early lead evaporate, loses big to IUP

| Saturday, Sept. 30, 2017, 10:06 p.m.

Seton Hill led No. 4 IUP, 14-9, less than two minutes into the second quarter of their PSAC matchup Saturday in Greensburg. The Griffins were thinking upset, but the Crimson Hawks put that notion to rest in a hurry.

IUP scored the next 48 points and routed the Griffins, 57-14. The Crimson Hawks moved to 5-0, 2-0 in the PSAC West. The Griffins remained winless (0-5, 0-2).

Seton Hill started the scoring less than six minutes into the game when Jarvis McClam scored on a 5-yard run. IUP took the lead quickly with a safety and an 8-yard touchdown run by Samir Bullock.

But the Griffins didn't fold and followed Bullock's score with another touchdown run from McClam (3 yards.)

It was all IUP after that. Bullock scored the game's next five touchdowns on runs of 1, 5, 15, 20 and 17 yards and amassed 263 for the day. Justice Evans added 114 yards rushing and a touchdown, and Lenny Williams threw a touchdown pass to Allen Wright.

McClam finished with 79 rushing yards on 16 carries. Seton Hill quarterback Christian Strong threw for 265 yards but was intercepted three times.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me