ShareThis Page
District Colleges

Former Franklin Regional teammates to meet in Midlands wrestling finals

Bill Beckner Jr.
| Saturday, Dec. 30, 2017, 4:42 p.m.
157: Josh Shields (Arizona St) TF Fred Green (Boise St), 18-2 5:51
Tony Rotundo/WrestlersAreWarriors.com
157: Josh Shields (Arizona St) TF Fred Green (Boise St), 18-2 5:51
Franklin Regional grad Michael Kemerer is a standout wrestler at Iowa.
Iowa athletics
Franklin Regional grad Michael Kemerer is a standout wrestler at Iowa.

They're a long way from Murrysville, but former high school teammates will get a reunion tonight on a wrestling mat in Illinois.

Franklin Regional graduates Josh Shields of Arizona State and Michael Kemerer of Iowa will face off in the championship match of the 55th Midlands Championships at 157 pounds.

Kemerer is ranked No. 2 in the country in the weight class by Intermat, while Shields is No. 7.

Shields, a redshirt sophomore, held off San Diego State's Luke Zilverberg, 4-0, in the semifinals. Kemerer, meantime, won by technical fall, 19-4, against Brown's Justin Staudenmayer to reach the finals for the second straight season. He is the defending champion at 157 and Iowa is the returning team champion.

Shields took third at Midlands last season.

Two other Franklin Regional grads also made the Midlands semifinals.

Iowa freshman Spencer Lee advanced to the 125-pound semis but lost to Ronnie Bresser of Oregon State, 3-1. Lee is redshirting this season so he is wrestling unattached.

Bucknell senior Tyler Smith, meantime, fell into the consolation bracket with a 5-4 loss to Mason Smith of Central Michigan at 141.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me