ShareThis Page
District Colleges

Seton Hill women stun No. 10 Cal U

Bill Beckner Jr.
| Saturday, Jan. 13, 2018, 4:27 p.m.
Seton Hill's Cheyenne Trest, a Canon-McMillan graduate, has received PSAC Rookie of the Week six times this season.
Seton Hill athletics
Seton Hill's Cheyenne Trest, a Canon-McMillan graduate, has received PSAC Rookie of the Week six times this season.

Seton Hill women's basketball used a fourth-quarter surge to stun No. 10-ranked Cal U, 64-58, on Saturday afternoon at the McKenna Center in Greensburg.

Senior guard Jenna Kaufman scored 16 points and grabbed 10 rebounds and freshman Cheyenne Trest added 15 points for Seton Hill, which has won four straight and 10 of its last 11.

The win marks Seton Hill's biggest upset since it joined the NCAA in 2006.

Cal U had a 10-game winning streak and an 11-game PSAC streak halted.

The Griffins (13-4, 8-3) trailed the Vulcans (15-2, 10-1), 49-39, after three quarters.

Senior guard Alex Hay added 11 points, nine rebounds and four assists for Seton Hill, which shot 50 percent (21 of 42). Hay's 3-pointer gave the Griffins the lead for good with 3:42 remaining in the game.

Trest went 7 for 7 from the foul line, including 4 for 4 inside the final 42 seconds.

Shatara Parsons scored 19 points, Mia Cushon added 15 and Abbey Sporio had 13 for Cal U, which was limited to 39 percent shooting.

Seton Hill is 5-1 at home this season.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me