ShareThis Page
District Colleges

St. Vincent playing underdog role at NCAA tournament

| Thursday, March 6, 2014, 10:51 p.m.
Saint Vincent's Dillon Stith puts back an offensive rebound between Washington & Jefferson's Ben Cecchini, left, and Connor Deckard during a playoff game Feb. 21, 2013.
Eric Schmadel | Tribune-Review
Saint Vincent's Dillon Stith puts back an offensive rebound between Washington & Jefferson's Ben Cecchini, left, and Connor Deckard during a playoff game Feb. 21, 2013.

The St. Vincent men's basketball team will find itself in an unusual role this weekend — the underdog.

After winning a second straight Presidents' Athletic Conference championship, St. Vincent (22-6) now returns to the NCAA Division III tournament, traveling to play the College of Wooster — ranked No. 8 in's final regular-season poll — in Ohio at 7:30 p.m. Friday.

“It's kind of a tough situation because they don't give our conference a lot of respect when it comes to tournament seeding,” St. Vincent senior Dillon Stith said. “Last year they probably gave us the toughest game in our region.”

Wooster is one of the toughest places for visiting teams to play, boasting the second-highest regular attendance for Division III home games, Stith said.

In recent years, the PAC has not been known as a strong basketball conference, comprised mostly of private liberal arts schools. The Bearcats are helping to change that perception, and a win over Wooster would be a big step in that direction.

“We're not the old PAC. PAC basketball is very good now,” St. Vincent coach D.P. Harris said. “We've made a difference in this league, and we're changing the culture of the fans that come to the game.”

At the start of the season, Harris said other teams in the PAC thought the Bearcats were going to be good. Harris figured his team would be good around January and February.

He was mostly right.

Although the Bearcats started February with a 3-4 record, they won their last two games in the month and the first in March to sweep through the playoffs and repeat as PAC champions.

“A lot of the guys had our heads down walking around campus,” Stith said. “We had a team meeting after the senior night loss to Bethany and our coach said, ‘I don't know what you need to get your mojo back, but we're still defending conference champions.' ”

Stith, a 6-foot-5 forward, was named PAC Player of the Year on Tuesday after averaging 19.8 points and 10.3 rebounds per game, including a 50-point performance in a 124-121 quadruple overtime loss to Thiel on Feb. 5, setting St. Vincent's record for points in a game.

“I've known him since he was 6 years old, so it's huge to see him grow and become the player that he is today,” Harris said. “I don't think I've ever coached a player that has put up those kinds of numbers.”

St. Vincent senior guard Isaac Turner finished second in the voting and averaged 21.6 points to lead the Bearcats.

With help from the coaching staff, St. Vincent players have been preparing for their test against Wooster. The Fighting Scots pose a unique challenge as a guard-oriented team, led by North Coast Athletic Conference Player of the Year Doug Thorpe and first-team all-NCAC guard Xavier Brown.

St. Vincent sees the game as an opportunity to show off the PAC's player of the year.

“They kind of have a couple Isaac Turners in a way,” Stith said. “But they're little on the forward side, and that's right up me and (junior forward Sean Kett)'s alley.”

“It's a big game, and that's when the biggest players step up.”

Gary Horvath is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me