ShareThis Page
Duquesne

Record shooting from 3-point range propels Duquesne men past Delaware State

| Saturday, Dec. 9, 2017, 6:57 p.m.
Coach Keith Dambrot led Duquesne to its third consecutive victory Saturday afternoon.
Coach Keith Dambrot led Duquesne to its third consecutive victory Saturday afternoon.

Mike Lewis II scored 23 points with a career-high seven 3-pointers, Eric Williams Jr. added 22 points and Duquesne hit a school-record 18 3-pointers in beating Delaware State, 97-48, on Saturday to extend its winning streak to three.

The 49-point margin of victory was the largest by a Duquesne team since a school-record 129-59 win over Howard on Nov. 9. 2007, and it's the first time the Dukes held an opponent to under 50 points since a 67-45 win over St. Louis on Jan. 12, 2011.

Lewis and Rene Castro-Caneddy hit consecutive 3-pointers in the Dukes' opening 16-3 run, and Duquesne never trailed en route to a 53-16 halftime lead behind Williams' 16 points. Lewis hit three consecutive 3s early in the second half, and the Dukes led by as many as 50.

Castro-Caneddy scored 12 points and had a career-high 10 assists for Duquesne (5-3), which made 25 assists in scoring 33 of 68 field goals (48.5 percent). Tarin Smith had a career-high six assists, and Williams had nine rebounds and three steals. It was Lewis' fourth 20-point game of the season and the 13th of his career.

The Dukes scored 27 points on 18 Hornets turnovers and outscored them 21-12 on fast breaks.

Artem Tavakalyan scored 13 points to lead the the Hornets (2-10), who have lost five in a row.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me