ShareThis Page

Hours away from another punking? Duquesne hopes not

Jerry DiPaola
| Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2018, 2:36 p.m.
Duquesne's Mike Lewis II leads the team with 16.2 points per game.
Dave DeNoma | Duquesne athletics
Duquesne's Mike Lewis II leads the team with 16.2 points per game.

No one on the Duquesne men's basketball team speaks the truth better than sophomore guard Mike Lewis.

So when he explained what happened in the Dukes' first game against Saint Louis — a 76-63 loss on the road Jan. 17 — he probably was accurate.

“To be honest, they punked us in Saint Louis,” he said.

Lewis' use of the word punked is interesting. His explanation of its meaning slightly deviates from

The website characterizes punked as “a way to describe someone ripping you off, tricking you, teasing you.”

It's possible Duquesne (15-14, 6-10) was tricked and teased by Saint Louis (16-13,9-7), which performed above its shooting ability, scoring its most points (76) in an Atlantic 10 victory this season.

But Lewis said the loss went beyond basketball.

“Like you're not there,” he said, defining the word for a reporter not up on urban slang. “A couple of guys were in the paint, and (the Billikens) just ran right through us.

“Punking is ‘Excuse me, young guy, get out of the way' ”

That's something the Dukes are seeking to avoid as they prepare for their rematch with Saint Louis on Wednesday night at Palumbo Center.

Duquesne can climb higher in the A-10 standings and earn a first-round bye in the conference tournament by winning its last two regular-season games. The Dukes visit Massachusetts on Saturday.

But it won't be easy.

Coach Keith Dambrot said the loss to Saint Louis was the only game this season the Dukes weren't in contention to win after halftime.

“They're big and strong and physical, and they just punked us in all aspects. As simple as that. P-U-N-K-E-D,” the 59-year-old Dambrot said.

How can Duquesne avoid another punking? Lewis may have a solution.

“They're going to come in here with the same mindset,” he said. “Try to get us on the boards, bust us up a lot, just play physical and play a fast-paced game.”

Saint Louis, which is 7-3 since beating Duquesne, is the A-10's top rebounding team (37.5 per game), but it's 11th in shooting percentage (42.1).

“We know they're not the greatest shooting team,” Lewis said, “so we're going to try pack it in (under the basket) and get ready for those guys.”

Lewis didn't mean any disrespect of a team that already beat him by 13 points.

But did he just punk Saint Louis?

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me