ShareThis Page
Duquesne

Second-seeded Duquesne women ousted early in A-10 Tournament

| Friday, March 2, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

RICHMOND, Va. — Saint Louis' Jackie Kemph tied a career-high with 28 points as seventh-seeded Saint Louis upset second-seed Duquesne, 71-65, on Friday in the Atlantic 10 quarterfinals at Richmond Coliseum.

The Dukes defeated the Billikens, 77-66, in their regular-season meeting in Saint Louis just 16 days ago.

Kemph scored 14 points in the second quarter to keep the Billikens within one point of Duquesne, 39-38, at halftime. The Dukes built their lead on the strength of 14 points from Julijana Vojinovic.

But in the second half, Vojinovic was held to three points — a 3-point shot with 19.5 seconds left — as Saint Louis slowly pulled ahead.

The Billikens led 65-60 with 4 minutes, 8 seconds remaining in the game, and neither team scored again until there were 33 seconds left. Kerri McMahan made 5 of 6 free throws down the stretch to help seal the win for Saint Louis.

Kadri-Ann Lass led the Dukes (23-7) with 18 points. Vojinovic added 17, and Conor Richardson (Carlynton) and Chassidy Omogrosso (Blackhawk) had 11 each. Paige Rakers added 15 points for Saint Louis.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me