ShareThis Page
Penn State

Freshman Stevens sparks Penn State's upset of No. 21 Maryland

| Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2017, 8:30 p.m.
Penn State's Lamar Stevens (right) is fouled by Maryland's Justin Jackson during the second half Tuesday, Feb., 7, 2017, in University Park. Penn State won 70-64.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Penn State's Lamar Stevens (right) is fouled by Maryland's Justin Jackson during the second half Tuesday, Feb., 7, 2017, in University Park. Penn State won 70-64.
Penn State's Tony Carr puts up a shot against Maryland's Damonte Dodd (35) during the first half Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2017.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Penn State's Tony Carr puts up a shot against Maryland's Damonte Dodd (35) during the first half Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2017.
Penn State's Lamar Stevens (11) goes for a rebound against Maryland's Anthony Cowan (0) during the first half Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2017.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Penn State's Lamar Stevens (11) goes for a rebound against Maryland's Anthony Cowan (0) during the first half Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2017.

UNIVERSITY PARK — Lamar Stevens considers himself a shooter now that he's spent weeks in the gym working behind the 3-point line.

But Penn State's freshman forward is more than that, and his performance in the Nittany Lions' 70-64 victory over No. 21 Maryland on Tuesday night is a perfect case study.

Stevens scored 16 of his 25 points in the second half and helped the Nittany Lions keep one of the Big Ten's best offenses out of sync all game. Stevens seemed to score at will from all angles and all parts of the court to lift Penn State to its fourth win over a top-25 opponent since last February.

“We put the ball inside to him. He made some good decisions,” Penn State coach Patrick Chambers said. “Posted up, a couple of (isolations). He did a nice job of playing patient and solid, and it's good to have that guy we can put in.”

Tony Carr added 14 points, and Mike Watkins had 10 for the Nittany Lions (13-12, 5-7), who snapped a two-game skid.

Justin Jackson and Kevin Huerter scored 12 points each, and Melo Trimble added 11 for the Terrapins (20-4, 8-3), who lost their second in a row. Coming off a loss to No. 16 Purdue, Maryland struggled to convert on most of its possessions.

Inside, Penn State clogged the paint with Stevens, Watkins and Julian Moore, and the Terps made just 20 of 59 shots. The Nittany Lions also forced 13 turnovers.

“Penn State was better than us tonight,” Maryland coach Mark Turgeon said. “They deserved to win. We couldn't get it going. We never had it.”

Until late.

Though the Nittany Lions led for all but 1 minute, 48 seconds and by as many as 14 points with 9:59 remaining, the Terps cut the lead to 62-58 with 3:26 left after Jackson and Jaylen Brantley hit consecutive 3s.

But a layup from Nazeer Bostick and six combined free throws from Carr, Stevens and Josh Reaves kept the game out of reach.

Trimble entered the game as the Big Ten's fifth-leading scorer and looked like he would keep up his 17.2 points-per-game pace. He drained his first three shots and added a free throw and led all scorers with eight points with the game tied 10-10.

But the sharpshooting guard went 1 for 10 from the field the rest of the way and had just one point — a free throw — in the second half despite playing 31 minutes.

“It was a strange night,” Turgeon said. “I do think he forced a couple. You know, he's doing what I asked him to do. I'm saying drive the ball. We got into double bonus early and we've got to step up and make free throws. We make our layups and free throws, it's a lot closer there at the end. Melo was trying hard.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me